you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

If kids engage and learn better if they have examples of people like them in the field they're studying, then it makes sense to have the curriculum mention people like them.

The idea of teaching is to have the kids learn isn't it?

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

If it is true than show that it works. And if it doesn't then stop doing it. Every single leftist program intended to increase the intelligence and achievement of non whites has failed spectacularly and none of them are ever acknowledged as failures.

Woke science amounts to "if it is a woke claim it must be true". Every Single Time.

Doesn't matter if it is illogical, completely contradicted by facts, or out right absurd.

Why is there no study that compares black kids taught in woke schools with black kids taught in traditional schools? Because everyone knows that the results will show wokism to be a fraud, but the (((people))) in power support wokism for it's anti white propaganda.

If you want to fabricate black heroes literally no one has a problem with that, but don't do it by attacking actual historical heroes because they were white. Don't bastardize the entire education system to cater to only non white students. Don't indoctrinate kids with anti white themes, racism, and propaganda.

By denying racial discrepancies in intelligence you create a void to explain why blacks underperform. That void is needed and used to fabricate claims of white racism and persecution.

Those black kids who can't read, write, or do math will absolutely fail in college. They will fail at their jobs. They will fail in their personal lives. All that failure will be denied as a result of their incompetence because the statistics will now show that they graduate in comparable percentage to whites and that will be claimed as evidence that they are equally capable. Then they will offer up white racism as an explanation for it all. And with the power of the media and academia they will make that the dominant narrative.

And with that these people will spread racism against whites, hatred, fear, animosity, and self-righteous violence.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

(((fuck))) (((you're))) (((a))) (((creep))) (((mate))).

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

name calling is low pyramid. let's keep it above the belt. https://saidit.net/static/PyramidDebate.jpg

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It is, but you get that the tripple brackets is an antisemitic thing right?

I enjoy that this is a haven of free speech, but if people are going to be a racist cunt, I feel obligated to point that out as clearly and as close to as offensively as they're being as I can manage. I the spirit of the freedom that allows them to be a racist cunt.

And I find that I haven't the energy for a discussion on the evidential basis informing modern pedagogic theory with a creep who thinks "By denying racial discrepancies in intelligence you create a void to explain why blacks underperform". As if those few racist intelligence theories from the 1970s have some scholarly standing.

There's just way too much shit to shovel on that one.