Wake up. There is no epidemic

submitted by zyxzevn from i.redd.it

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ziggy5 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Again, why are you acting like a child? This isnt an illuminati conspiracy theory. This was said in the very beginning and we have known this for over 500 years: Being vaccinated protects YOU from being damaged but it doesnt mean you cant harm other people from it by being a carrier. This is why people were told that vaccinated people weren't safer. It's like carrying aids and it having no affect on you but then giving it to someone and having it ravage them. Or carrying Ebola and being immune to it but giving it to vulnerable people.

You're not even conservative and if you're advocating for hysterical propaganda.

[–]MarkJeffersonGreen Party 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

AIDS is a virus syndrome- not a pathogen that can be carried. You're talking about HIV. If you ARE "carrying" AIDS then you ARE already being affected and ravaged by it.

Also, if you're carrying Ebola and giving it to vulnerable people then the Ebola has already been propagating in and bursting your own cells to enable itself to infect others. There's no such thing as "being immune to Ebola" and yet still replicating and spreading it in the way you describe. Any trace viroids are rapidly tagged by proximal antibodies and consumed by your T-cells or undergo entropy.

There may be some reasonable arguments that can be made for increasing herd immunity by reducing opportunities for adaptive mutations but that's definitely not what you're talking about here. You're also expelling a lot of random bluster and ad homs but you seem to be out of your depth when it comes to this subject.

[–]ziggy5 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You mean im supposed to be incredibly careful and specific with terms around a crowd of people who think we "shred" the virus and the conservatives need masks to protect themselves from the "shredding" of vaccinated people being injected with Bill Gates microchips?

You're awfully full of yourself for being this stringent with semantics judging by the people you're surrounded by on here as if they'd know the difference between AIDS and HIV.

Vaccines protect you from the virus that you can still carry and affect other people with. Where's the illuminati conspiracy? And you also comment on LGBdroptheT. Do your homosexual friends know how completely batshit crazy you are?

[–]MarkJeffersonGreen Party 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You're awfully full of yourself for being this stringent with semantic judging by the people you're surrounded by on here as if they'd know the difference between AIDS and HIV.

Yeah, I'm AWFULLY full of myself for daring to correct you on your ignorance. Either that or you were spreading disinfo and using medical terms in a manner you KNEW were wrong but you did it anyway because you assumed everyone would be too lazy/stupid to fact check it(which is oh SO much better I feel so happy that there are people like that out there "educating" the public like this). You think the difference between AIDS and HIV and the biology of immunity is just some mere formality to doctors? I'm sure no one at all gave a hang about semantics during those 500+ years of immunization development. Who cares whether the label says 'Polio' or 'Hepatitis' or the pathological difference between rubeola and roseola(they look the same to the hicks)?

The rest of what your rant is essentially more excuses/justifications for what you just did and Ad Hominem towards me and others to distract from the egg on your face. Once again, you're out of your depth.