you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Therefore what he testified to is nothing but lies?

Of course, this didn’t happen or we would have heard about it by now. But Officer Dunn knows he can say this because the mainstream fake news media will NEVER ask him to prove it.

How is he supposed to prove what was said to him? Was he supposed to go on snapchat and stream the racial slurs tossed his way?

And Officer Dunn even supported the mass destruction in Kenosha, Wisconsin last yea

One thing I like about the article is that the article is trying to make it look like that Dunn is lying because he cant prove what was said. However, in that very same article Harry is accused of saying the following, "Harry Dunn said the burning of Kenosha was an ‘appropriate response’" The article posted no proof that he said that, why is there no video of Dunn saying the Kenosha response was appropriate? Funny, the website is using an unsubstantiated tweet as proof Dunn supported the response in Kenosha. The guy who made posted tweet did not provide a link to video or audio of Dunn saying the response was appropriate.

Shalom

✡️

[–]raven9 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How is he supposed to prove what was said to him? Was he supposed to go on snapchat and stream the racial slurs tossed his way?

When there was a ton of other people all doing exactly that and uploading thousands of hours of video if there was any such thing as Trump supporters chanting racial slurs at black cops the mainstream media would have been all over it. That man is a liar. It never happened.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]ShalomEveryoneCommunist Party 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Why is murder an appropriate response to property damage but property damage isn't an appropriate response to murder?

    The tweet looks like a question to me pointing out Tucker's ridiculous stance on what went on in Kenosha. That 17 year old drove across state lines to "protect property" that's not his. The guy blasts two people away, Tucker acts like the guy is a hero. Someone trashes a building Tucker acts like it's an outrage, it's the end of the world and something has to be done and be done now!

    In the tweet, I still don't see where he said he supports mass destruction. The word support or any synonym of the word support does not appear in the tweet.

    Shalom

    ✡️