Convictions

submitted by Tarrock from (media.consumeproduct.win)

all 19 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]PatsyStone 8 insightful - 7 fun8 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

Given my many sexual fetishes and extremist political views, I'm likely a part of the child-sex ring.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (11 children)

What the everloving fuck!? Moral grandstanding??

[–]jet199 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

There's a whole section of people who think anything to worrying about child abuse is hysterical and a moral panic.

Likely they've been groomed by intellectual paedos from before Foucault to think smart, elite people are above such petty domestic issues.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's the cub/bear dynamic. It's seen as appropriate to take a young gay person and teach them in a sexual relationship. Kevin Spacey got in trouble for that but normally nothing happens. Seems to be the same for trans.

Although tbf, I think almost every straight woman, and a lot of guys including myself, that I know lost their virginity while underage to an older person.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

You know, "moral grandstanding in the ass." You never heard that term? /s

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

No - it's just a dumb comment by a dumbass, and then used by the right-wing because they've got nothing better to complain about

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

You're familiar with the gay cub/bear dynamic? The comment concerns me that they may support the trans version of that. Because they don't see it as child abuse, it would explain why they would dismiss complaints of grandstanding. NAMBLA-esque.

I wouldn't call myself a liberal any more though. Among other things I can't stand them arguing against free speech and framing it as a right wing issue.

That used to be a very important issue for us 90s era liberals because it still wasn't very acceptable to be in the lgb (not sure T was in it yet) community. That free speech protected them.

And I think we're now seeing a backlash against the extreme vocal liberals, which makes this more important than ever. Sure, it protects right wingers now, but when they're in charge it'll protect the left again.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Sorry - I have no idea about the "gay cub/bear dynamic" or NAMBLA. Thanks for this, however. Every reference I've seen to child-sex ring claims in the US, and potential connections to Democrats, has been debunked as Republican disinformation. I've not seen much in the news about child sex rings in the US, though I've also not looked for it. In recent years, child sex rings were busted in Germany and the UK, which gave rise to concerns about the roles of men of Pakistan descent in the majority of cases. This has been used by politicians to fuel xenophobia, but it really does annoy me that the culprits tend to be from this one area of the world. Human trafficking is however well-known among Russian, Serbian, Albanian, Thai, and other organized gangs. Those who are caught seem not to be under the protection of the wealthier criminals. But this is what I gather in newspapers.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This isn't the child sex ring stuff, it's apolitical. This happens when a young person first discovers they're homosexual, especially pre Internet when there was no way to get information easily and you had to be in the closet. Often an older person of the community teaches them via a sexual relationship. This was not long ago considered acceptable in the community, that's just how you got into the scene.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I've not seen much in the news about child sex rings in the US

You mean the commie-socialist-libtard controlled MSM? Rachel Madcow, Andy Cooper, NYT, CNN, et al has not released any hard-hitting investigative exposes? Golly gee, wonder why? The Justice Dept (now thoroughly infiltrated by leftards/libturds) seems to think it's no small problem:

https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/child-sex-trafficking

Organizations dealing with this 'little' problem seem not to think it's "Republican disinformation":

https://www.savethechildren.org/us/charity-stories/child-trafficking-myths-vs-facts

https://www.missingkids.org/theissues/trafficking

https://www.childrensrights.org/newsroom/fact-sheets/child-sex-trafficking/

But I'm soooo sure the leftist media (that has been so deadly accurate in their news coverage and assertions over the last 4+ years), knows waaaay better than any of the above sources what is a non-issue.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am not saying that the child sex rings don't exist in the US. I'm saying that there is no evidence that Democrats are the ones to blame for all of it, obviously. For example, the Epstein trafficking was something Trump enjoyed, and probably supported, but it was managed by Epstein and his people.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No - it's just a dumb comment by one of a multitude of leftist dumbasses, and then used by the right-wing because:

  1. We like to give the commie-socialists a taste of their own medicine, and harvest the resulting snowflake tears.

  2. We recognize the obvious hypocrisy of this comment, and that of its libturd defender.

  3. We love it when such dirtbags freely admit their moral bankruptcy.....extra points if they are too stoopid to realize they done it.

[–]GraviPirate Party 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Says has morals, clearly doesn't fucking have 'em.

[–]Optimus85Independent 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I'm going to be 100% honest. I'm a paid social media influencer trivializing pedophilia and child abuse.

[–]hennaojichan 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Previous Convictions. Hey Muskie.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Howdy Hennaoji.

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Let's get crazy later. It's morning coffee and feed the turtle time over here. When my mother-in-law was hospitalized we took care of it and that little reptile grows on you. I like turtles.

[–]Retardation_station 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You know, I'm not at all surprised. I'm surprised they actually said it out loud, but not that they think that way.

[–]hfxB0oyAPirate Party 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Being against child rape is moral grandstanding?