you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Regarding Stalin, do you know much about the Red Mafiya and Ashkenazi Jewish influence in Russia? I know some about these but not where they overlap, as it seems obvious there must have been some great or small interactions though history.

judeo-christian faith

Manufactured nonsense for social engineered tolerance and consent.

israel still stands today partly due to its rather advanced civilization compared to its neighbours

Yes but no. Dominant forces have meddled, infiltrated, manipulated, exploited, oppressed, and murdered millions. Disaster capitalism creates chaos to rebuild with rigged systems. Everywhere. This is not new.

Pretending for a moment that 6 million Jews actually died among the 75 million killed in WWII, why doesn't anyone care about the rest? Shouldn't there be more new "homelands" and such for those who suffered?

do a better job at controlling covid.

COVID is another false narrative to oppress people. Quarantine the sick and weak and the rest is obviously tyranny for their Great Reset, New Normal, and vaccine passport in service of their depopulation and slave state /s/Agenda21_Agenda2030.

just look at how safe it is to walk the streets in authoritarian governments. because there's no mobsters there.

ALL politicians are mobsters.

and they certainly would not allow virus to harass their people, whom they can always profit from.

1) You can't be certain of this at all.

2) The perpetual sickcare system is exceptionally profitable and powerful.

cc /u/Jesus

[–]blowininthewind 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

i'd agree that all politicians are mobsters. but note that the best mobsters are quite civilized when they make money. it's the lower level mobsters that do the dirty work.

russia suffered the greatest loss in world war 2, the second is china, but the holocaust is remembered, along with the rape of nanking, because they're not warfare. if warfare is white and ethnic cleansing is black, a lot of world war 2 is grey. but those two events are completely black: trained and armed soldiers against virtually defenseless civilians. nanking put up a very fierce fight using what was the best of the chinese military at the time, so in a way the japanese were letting out their anger. but holocaust is planned from beginning to the very end, however malicious its adversary (jewish people) might be, they're virtually defenseless.

history is full of coincidences, not planned actions. in the long run, nearly all plans fail, and nearly all coincidences happen to shape the course of history. external conditions (geography, climate, etc.) have much more effect on history than plans. to say history can be planned by a few plotting in the dark is to say command economy is effective ---- since a few can plan history by themselves, why don't half a dozen socialist nations produce a single good command economy?

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

it's the lower level mobsters that do the dirty work.

Agreed.

if warfare is white and ethnic cleansing is black, a lot of world war 2 is grey.

Excellent analogy (aside from potential racial misinterpretations).

but holocaust is planned from beginning to the very end, however malicious its adversary (jewish people) might be, they're virtually defenseless.

If you buy the official narrative. Climate change was my hardest red pill to swallow. The second hardest was looking at Holocaust skepticism, but once you realize it's a huge exaggeration you can't unsee that. Here's a long documentary that presents many of the best arguments to remain skeptical: https://www.bitchute.com/video/4oXNuZIaYFVt/

history is full of coincidences, not planned actions.

No. It's full of both coincidences and conspiracies.

in the long run, nearly all plans fail, and nearly all coincidences happen to shape the course of history.

Broad baseless generality nonsense.

a few plotting in the dark

Why bother in the dark when they can do it in the open with government, deep state, secret agencies, NGOs, councils, groups, commissions, think tanks, militaries, etc, while feeding everyone misinformation on the media they monopolize and control?

why don't half a dozen socialist nations produce a single good command economy?

I don't understand this question. Which nations? What do you mean by "socialist"? The term means many things these days. And what do you mean by "produce a single good command economy?"

Furthermore, what does it have to do with conspiracies, Russians, and Zionists? I'm not saying it's not all connected on many levels but this has gone from specific to widely abstract and moot.

[–]blowininthewind 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

i don't think holocaust is a huge exaggeration, in that the allies have no need to exaggerate it at its discovery in '45. the allies knew from world war 1 that it's best to heal the wounds than tear your opponent apart, as france did to germany in the inter-war period. hence the marshal plan, the democratic germany PM's kneeling, the EU, etc. under this narrative it'd be best for the allies to downplay the holocaust. i think the fifties is a moment when good miraculously won over the evil.

as to our different view on history, here's what i think: vietnam turned capitalist, russia turned capitalist, the brilliant cccp scientists failed to produce a good computer that lasted til this day, americans and the west produced the backbone of the brand new computer industry by freely roaming around, really. china turned capitalist, cuba is now opening up. on the other side look at iran, north korea. all the balkan states are capitalist now. seriously the only social democracies that is genuinely good are all in northern europe.

oftentimes history is like: i planned this, then that happened, so the entire thing becomes another, totally unexpected thing. why? because history runs in parallel. a million things are happening simultaneously and you never know which ten of them is going to determine the main course of the future.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

i don't think holocaust is a huge exaggeration

Because you haven't skeptically researched it. Once you start it all becomes very clear very quickly.

in that the allies have no need to exaggerate it at its discovery in '45

Nonsense. You're sadly mistaken if you think the war was over then. The next few years saw half a million Germans executed, Nazis and civilians alike. https://saidit.net/search?q=Hellstorm Check this out, watch the Spinning Squirrel documentary I linked you previously and read this: https://infogalactic.com/info/Truther_Top_20_Counter_Points_To_The_Official_Holocaust_Story Then debate me.

It wasn't "discovered". Concentration slave camps were well known on both sides. There were no death camps. That's an exaggeration and myth that was developed post-war. ALL of Europe was in a fuel and food and typhoid crisis, along with the war. That is why you see the piles of hundreds of corpses (not millions).

The Holocaust didn't pick up mainstream propaganda attention until the 1970s. Why wait so long?

the allies

Were the victors and liars about the German underdogs led by a maniac. All government is evil. German citizens did not deserve their fate, nor did the rest of Europe and Russia, nor the rest of the world. WWI and WWII and the Balfour Declaration were all planned in the 1800s while Queen Victoria was a reclusive junkie and her son Edward was actually an effective and brilliant tyrant.

The Dresden firebombing was war crime against humanity, as were the atom bombs, and many other events of WWII. No one was punished. Of course the victors get to write history as they see fit to justify their sins and everyone else's narrative gets demonized.

i think the fifties is a moment when good miraculously won over the evil.

Nonsense. The focus of the ruling class and their evil schemes simply shifted and grew over a world suffering in post-war trauma. Wars for Korea and Vietnam were planned well in advance.

as to our different view on history

I agree. The commies have become more capitalist and the capitalists have become more communist. The result: everyone is more totalitarian (a fusion of the two) and the lockdown has exponentially accelerated the globalists totalitarian tyranny. Northern Europe seems nice from afar but I also know they are not exempt from corruption or tyranny.

oftentimes history is like: i planned this, then that happened, so the entire thing becomes another, totally unexpected thing.

Not unexpected. It's the Hegelian dialectic: thesis, antithesis, synthesis or problem, reaction, solution. If I'm a politician and want more control I let shit slide until the people demand I take more action to clamp down with more power. No one else in the world runs a scam like the government: fail harder to get an increase in pay and power.

a million things are happening simultaneously and you never know which ten of them is going to determine the main course of the future.

Yes but no. A million things are not equally important. Government is both very slow to react AND very fast. If you want something processed quickly or slowly it ultimately depends on who is driving it. The powers that should not be may be slower to respond to a natural organic authentic social movement but when they do they have all the force of the mainstream and usually come with more than enough preparation to get even the stupidest corrupt concepts pushed into the common consciousness, by brute force if necessary. This includes myths about WWII victims.

[–]blowininthewind 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Because you haven't skeptically researched it. Once you start it all becomes very clear very quickly.

scapegoats are used throughout history. if you read memoirs like the forgotten soldier (guy sajer), you'd find that germans are quite egalitarian among themselves (sajer himself has both french and german blood but you can still feel the egalitarian kinda atmosphere between the soldiers, the german home front commoners, etc.). so the only way to rally them up for war is to find such a scapegoat. and then there's chomsky, who's stance on israel is quite well known and is much much more well-read than many history professors i think. go search holocaust on chomsky.info.

i can only respond loosely to the other comments. but basically it's like this: a bat caught a cold, or something else, and suddenly the world is a much more dangerous place for many very well-off humans. twitter and facebook happened and the russians learnt SEO and suddenly trump was president. the black swans are creeping up to every aspect of our lives.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed.

Chomsky is a limited hangout.

Most Jews are scapegoats brainwashed to believe they are victims, while their leadership (like all leadership) has disproportionate power and does evil shit with it. Some Jewish culture is problematic with their scriptures justifying deception and supremacy and wanting to enslave the goyim, but it's the Zionists, Jews or not, who are the big problem.