you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]blowininthewind 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (18 children)

aaron schwartz did an experiment a long time ago and wrote an article called 'who writes wikipedia?' in which he points out that there's an inner circle of wikipedia users, a couple hundred people, formatting and re-organizing all the articles on it, making well over half the edits on the entire site. yet the bulk of information is contributed by the masses, he concludes.

i've seen conservative wikipedia somewhere. i forgot where. but if you could provide a source that'd be great.

also, in the future, please have constructive conversations that are based on facts, not opinions.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

Are you a bot? Something about your rhetoric gives me that impression. I don't care about Conservative wiki or whatever you are gibbering about; wikipedia and most sites are owned by Zionists. Read books.

[–]blowininthewind 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

no, i know how gpt works, along with textgan, bert, etc. used to make money doing that, offering people 'advice' (i feel bad but it's money) when it's really just generated text. if you doubt me, i can make a bot that does low-frequency chatting on saidit, and post the link to you. now, the reason you know that i'm not is because my speech varies too much to be classified as that. these language models generate text based on previous text generated in the short task, which gives the text a very connected feeling.

if you don't care, others will. many cared about aaron's cause, for example. but to me you cannot even define the term 'Zionist supremacy' to me. a political movement must have words backing it up. so furthermore i don't think whatever that's related to 'Zionist supremacy' would succeed because not much thought have been put into it.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Dude, you're 100% a bot. I can tell. /u/Jasoncarswell

Your writing style is not human like.

But nevertheless, Zionism is a corporate ideology initialised at the Zionist Basel "eugenics" congresses funded by over 900 multi-national foreign corporations to commercialise Palestine via foreged documents and later by the bomb and sword. Zionism isn't a belief... it is a shitty sub-franchise McDonalds centered on resources and money and it just so happens Jews become the center pieces in this scam that they don't see that the universalist Jews eventually be scapegoated. Nevertheless, Zionism is also fueled by false biblical and secular nationalistic zealotry and Supremacist orthodox Judaism which pretends to be anti-Zionist but then asks for government welfare and security. The Jewish establishemnt in the US funds 95% of Zionist causes that is FOREIGN TO US interests.

[–]blowininthewind 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

sure, i'd spend some free time to make a saidit bot then. here's the project link: https://github.com/simin75simin/saiditchatbot i've wanted to do this kinda thing for a long time, machine speech is not good.

if you're a reader and not a commenter be sure to check out my libgen mass book downloading project: https://github.com/simin75simin/libgencrawl

lol.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Neat tools. See also: /s/SaidItBots

You interested in helping us branch out the SaidIt community out?

We're not only trying to raise decentralized platforms and forums, build bridges between them, and also to archive and distribute web-scrapes of all the shared content.

[–]blowininthewind 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

i'm only repackaging very well known stuff, bert, gpt, etc. basically all the sota nlg stuff if you're in this business. just today i saw something new and popular coming up along these lines.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I don't know about bot, but their comments do drift off focus. Some people have half a conversation in their head and forget to lay down breadcrumbs for everyone else follow their train of thought, much less have a point.

which gives the text a very connected feeling

Bot or not, that's not what I feel.

Zionism is a corporate ideology...

That was okay (not great) for me, but it certainly wasn't your best if your definition was meant to connect and educate the normie sheeple.

Next Saturday at our weekly local Windsor Ontario lockdown protests I'm finally going to say a few words about Agenda 2030 to give many there a wider contextual understanding to explain the chaos and why we really need prepare, organize, and resist. I'll be avoiding the "Zionist problem" this time around. Not quite sure how to summarize it in just a couple minutes. Off hand do you know of anything short I can just read off?

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Ahhh, anything by Alice McDowell, Corey Morningstar, TheWrongKindofGreen blog and the Art of Annihilation blog is a start. They put out wonderful detailed work on where we are heading.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Saved for the references, but I'm NOT looking for detailed work. I just want to present a short, clear, concise black pill summary that is as accurate and palatable as possible to normies, skeptics, protesters, etc. in my community.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think McDowell does a great job at makng the agenda easy to understand specifically in regards to health and education through social impact value markets. Her videos on the 4IR are amazing, so you could start there and take info from them on her YouTube.

[–]blowininthewind 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

go join a cult and stop using that name plz.

along with Jasoncarswell, you guys are obsessive. my hands are numb typing up replies even though i code for a living.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

among the jewish population rising from the holocaust. but it had the chance to survive because the plans of the bigger nations to keep the arab world from unifying and stopping their rival's world domination plans. --BlowintheeindZionist

Hmmmm

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

which gives the text a very connected feeling

Bot or not, that's not what I feel.

but to me you cannot even define the term 'Zionist supremacy' to me.

So far as I saw, he nor I attempted to define it yet, so to say we cannot is premature. All we've shown is how compromised Wikipedia is, and that was just a surface scratch. It's rotten to the core.

a political movement must have words backing it up.

Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

Obviously you're oblivious to the real power that we're not allowed to openly speak of without suffering censorship on all the major platforms.

[–]blowininthewind 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

dude, chill. if you're interested in this kinda stuff, maybe i'd use ray and delegate a part of the compute for training onto your machine. otherwise, mind your own biz, i'm sure it's not politics lol.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Zionist supremacy and the corporatocracy are the greatest threats to humanity.

"dude, chill." is not an adequate defense of Zionism nor any kind of respectful discussion.

Just because you don't understand it because it's not in the mainstream media that they control, doesn't mean I'm wrong.

My biz is resisting tyranny.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

making well over half the edits on the entire site. yet the bulk of information is contributed by the masses, he concludes.

Ya, but no.

The majority of the edits were tiny, from punctuation to grammar tweaks to adding a citation here and there. Meanwhile, the bulk of the article bodies were written by people who made only a few big contributions rather than hundreds or thousands of tiny one like the "core" editors/janitors.

Fact: Conservapedia, Metapedia, and InfoGalactic, among others, all exist.

please have constructive conversations that are based on facts

LOL.

[–]blowininthewind 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

fucking chill already. i'm just a layperson who think about these things a lot and have some ideas about where things might go from here.

aaron became aaron because he wrote a lot of useful code, made a lot of real effort to change the world. from a very early age he excelled at both of these, and thus people made a documentary about him, the internet's own son. so when he's thirty years old, some of his programs became standards of the internet, and some of his ideas became congressional bills (SOPA, i think, look at his wikipedia page, or .gov page if you don't trust wikipedia).

if you really want to mold the world by your will, earn some serious money, write some really nice code, develop neat pieces of technology. then you have a real say in this world. because you can give your money away and become a part of an interest group or you can use your technology to gain productivity at scale.

humanity 101: we value productivity. whomever provides we respect.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I am chill. No matter how many times you claim I'm not won't change that.

the internet's own son.

They glossed over some of his human minor flaws but it was an excellent documentary.

Aaron was against SOPA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz#Opposition_to_the_Stop_Online_Piracy_Act_(SOPA) You seem to be able to recall things but invert them.

earn some serious money

That's only possible if you sell out and support the establishment.

write some really nice code, develop neat pieces of technology.

We're trying to develop decentralized alternative platforms for truth-seekers (/s/Cassy, /s/PhoenixForum). I'm not I.T. so I can only try to help organize and manage and host instances.

then you have a real say in this world.

Or - on those instances (when they actually come online), as a 30+year professional animator and director I will be developing, managing, producing, and publishing counter-propaganda.

humanity 101: we value productivity. whomever provides we respect.

Great slogan!