you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Depends what you consider terrorism.

All governments are the worst terrorists, closely followed by banks and media.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Depends what you consider terrorism.

The use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

All governments are the worst terrorists, closely followed by banks and media.

What terrorist acts have been committed by the government of Norway?

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

This was a staged event that certainly had inside organization:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Norway_attacks

Any support or international participation in NATO or the United Nations' "peace keeping".

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Breivik did those attacks. He's not the government.

Peacekeeping isn't terrorism.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

You don't understand what a false flag is. The story falls to pieces upon actual investigation.

If you blow up a building the glass blows outward. If a truck blows up beside the building the glass will blow inward. Their "official" story, as always, is FULL OF LIES.

Among the best is is Ole Dammegård's coverage.
https://DuckDuckGo.com/?q=Ole+Dammagard+Norway+attack

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You don't understand what a false flag is.

I do. Breivik's own writings and confession are pretty clear though.

If you blow up a building the glass blows outward.

Plausibly, the majority of it. But that doesn't affect Breivik's own writings and confession.

Their "official" story, as always, is FULL OF LIES.

Anomaly hunting is a fun exercise for the whole family. But it doesn't establish a false flag. To do that you need to find the evidence of the false flag, not have some questions about the dynamics of shattering glass.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

The glass is an obvious piece of evidence.

If it's a psyop why would you trust the official narrative? Do you even know about the multiple shooters?

Do some research on it. Don't go to mainstream corporate sources who are limited hangouts and proven liars. Find MANY independent sources from different perspectives to triangulate in on your own truths.

If you don't even look you'll never see the truth and just be repeating lies. You have to look to see the obvious. Not all psyops are this obvious though. This is an easy one.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The glass is an obvious piece of evidence.

What does it obviously show?

If it's a psyop why would you trust the official narrative?

It's not that mysterious. A guy shot a lot of young people, because they weren't sufficiently right wing to meet his idea of good for the future.

Do you even know about the multiple shooters?

There was one shooter. Breivik. He had a manifesto and everything. Nasty guy, but sad story overall. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik