you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

For lose meanings of "true".

So, those photos and videos of the second plane as it struck the tower ... that wasn't a plane, it was merely a drone, clad to look excatly like the plane, and kept at the airport, with the knowledge of air traffic control?

And manufactured as a one-off from an factory somewhere controlled by Zonists?

Is that the gist?

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

Yes, a passenger jet drone. So, not a drone in the sense of a small predator drone, but a passenger jet transfixed with remote control. They were able to do this back in the 70's and can do it now. This is probably what happened taken into account the drills and ArcGIS data. Yes. As for where they came from, or what happened after that fact, we do not know. We do know, hoever, that UA93 was flying well after it 'crashed.'

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Yes, a passenger jet drone. So, not a drone in the sense of a small predator drone, but a passenger jet transfixed with remote control.

This remote control system is bolted on to an existing plane as a retrofit?

1) Who made this system?
* Was it a prototype?
2) Where was it fitted?
* What plane was it fitted to?
3) Where are there other examples of this system?

They were able to do this back in the 70's and can do it now.

Okay, show me who is selling and fitting these systems. Or even who has tested one. On a Boeing 767. Ever.

Yes. As for where they came from, or what happened after that fact, we do not know.

Well, having established that it exists, surely you can trace where it came from.

We do know, hoever, that UA93 was flying well after it 'crashed.'

Again. Link me to this data by which we "know" this.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

I just sent you the arcGis data. And the post explains in detail about it. I don't have all the answers but UA93 was flying that day after the alleged crash.

What we do know is what I posted in detail to you with sources. Read the long posts I commented to you, there you'll find and can read the data.

[–]turtlebam 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Just a thought, if you can ever compile some of your most important work in a PDF, that would be great idea. I scour your posts for info and save them manually into text, but some info is linked to other sites which I am afraid might be put down. This way some people can keep the PDF and easily upload them if they close more websites through torrents or can be a quick reference to copy and paste quality information into other forums.

I say this because I believe your research is one of the most important I ever came across. Either way I will try my best to save your content and try to spread it in anyway I can.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

My research is mostly from others... so you could say I know where to look and pool it into one place. I have a lot more saved elsewhere and have around 2000 pages of company documents of US corp and the fights between templars, Jesuits and Judeo-Masons that I want to upload soon because it really gets into the heart of where we are today.

A lot of posts are memoryholed. I noticed that, especially Twitter posts, unfortunately. I have most things saved locally anyway.

Half of my posts are saved via word document which can be exported into pdf form. I'm looking to do all my posts this way. The annoying thing is a lot of potos and diagrams are involved and savig them on word doc in the thousands takes up a lot of space and slows down word considerably. If I don't do this, the photos would be urls linked to its parent online source which could be memoryholed in the future.

Yeah, please do... spread it and post elsewhere. Probably a quarter is my content. Most is from others or compilations from others who have done more in depth research far beyond what I could do, or have the money to do, ie. looking in archives.

[–]turtlebam 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What matters is the information. I don't think anyone is doing this work for the credit. We probably need to avoid sourcing to URLs as much as we can, things are being deleted rather quickly nowadays. I feel that it doesn't matter to get all the small scholarly details as long as we can provide: 1-Something accessible for the normie to understand and convince in general terms. 2-Rationally sourced in a way that it is just not speculation.

Sometimes I think if all those involved in conspiracies, focus on just one topic, just one topic! We can make a breakthrough, right now we are all over the place. For example, September 11th can be a good topic. We do not have the numbers to show all the conspiracies in all history to everyone, but if we can show israeli involvement for that one on a mainstream scale we can unhinge jew/zionist power. A lot of energy is being put by the conspiracy community in minute details while what we need to reach is the normie.

you are doing great work, if you ever have any doc or pdf you want to save, please send me a message and I will at least save it and maybe others will do so that the word can stay out there under any clampdown.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I just sent you the arcGis data.

Sorry, I must have missed it.

Can you point out which of the links has the arcGIS data?

I don't have all the answers

No. I get that feeling. So I wonder how you reach a conclusion, particularly a grand conspiracy theory, involving false flags.

but UA93 was flying that day after the alleged crash.

An anomaly, if true. We should think about the plausible explanations.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You can play the skeptic forever, but instead of questioning Jesus (who knows his shit) about endless details why don't you do some research yourself?

We will never get all the answers simply because (((they))) control most of the information.

IMO, it's better to look at the big picture, the motives, who gains, and if they have a history of perpetual compulsive manipulation, deception, and lies.

Once you realize that "authority" (government, experts, media, corporations, banks, etc) are all liars and part of the globalist's effort for full spectrum dominance and enslavement of all of humanity, then it all makes much more sense.

[–]turtlebam 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Jesus knows what he is talking about. Most entertaining video on this subject: https://www.bitchute.com/video/xgT4RuWP2YL0/