Biden Absurdly Claims 'White Supremacy' is Bigger Terrorism Threat Than ISIS or Al Qaeda

submitted by scrubking from thegatewaypundit.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (33 children)

Zionist Jews thank you for your belief in their Straussian myth. Again, read Ellias Davidsson, David Ray Griffin, everyone of hos books, and Graeme MacQueen who effectively shows that the consoirators had a pre-fabricated script in place to blame the anthrax attacks on the Saudis, white supremacists, Al Qeada and Iraq. It's funny that the Jew Donald Kagan only a day after 9/11 mentioned that Al Qeada wheeled Anthrax and could use it on American citizens. Of course, MacQueen proves that it wasn't muslims but inteligence assets possibly linked to Mossad who did these attacks as well as 9/11. Not some stupid muslims who couldn't even fly single cesa engine planes.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (32 children)

On ya, mate.

who effectively shows that the consoirators had a pre-fabricated script in place to blame the anthrax attacks on the Saudis, white supremacists, Al Qeada and Iraq.

Not sure what his evidence was, nor how white supremacists and Iraq are on the same side of any conflict. But 9/11 wasn't an anthrax attack. There were some hijacked planes that were flown into buildings.

Not some stupid muslims who couldn't even fly single cesa engine planes.

The hijackers were known by:

1) Passengers and crew aboard the flights provided information about the hijackers while the hijacking was in progress.

and

2) From luggage and effects left behind, or, in one case, that didn't make the connecting flight.

Their identities isn't a guess. And the majority of them were Saudis.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (31 children)

You are so far behind in the details I cannot help you.

Again, PICK UP THE BOOK about the Anthrax attacks by Graeme MacQueen. The Anthrax attacks were directly linked to the 9/11 attacks and simulated HIJACKERS, which were pre-fabricated and pre-written into the script but were scrapped when neocons and other perps nearly outed themselves. Read the damn book.

THERE WAS NO HIJACKINGS period.

Other than possibly switching the transponder in midair but this doesn't account for the ghosting of Flight 177, which proves, the opposite. That drones were used.

Now screw off shill and go blame 9/11 on muslims somewhere else. I know who did 9/11 and it wasn't your dumb Saudi script that Zionist Haredi mafia Trump likes to bring up.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (30 children)

THERE WAS NO HIJACKINGS period.

Yeah there was. People on the flights identified that hijackers, and then the planes were flown into buildings.

Other than possibly switching the transponder in midair but this doesn't account for the ghosting of Flight 177, which proves, the opposite. That drones were used.

And these drones that look exactly like older planes, are manufactured where? Can you show me some examples of other drones from this factory? Or where the factory is?

Or are you saying that they were a bespoke 3D printing job, that looked really really good?

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (29 children)

People on the flights identified that hijackers, and then the planes were flown into buildings.

They're all allegedly dead and unverified. Even during the recordings (perhaps pre-recorded), some warned that it's a hoax. Further, there's conflicting stories about what actually took place on those planes.

that look exactly like older planes

Actually there's a lot of controversy about their appearance as they do NOT look exactly like the planes they're supposed to represent, including the paint jobs and bulge on the bottom.

You are being argumentative for the sake of it. Why not leave this forum and go back where you came from?

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

They're all allegedly dead and unverified.

So why have a fake plane if you're just going to kill everyone on the real one? Wouldn't it be simpler and cheaper just to use the real one.

Even during the recordings (perhaps pre-recorded), some warned that it's a hoax.

Link please.

including the paint jobs and bulge on the bottom.

Okay, you're claiming the fuselage was modified on the bottom? That's a big job mate. You're going to have to come up with where it was done before you're going to pick up anything approaching plausibility.

You are being argumentative for the sake of it.

There's a lot deep conspiracy theory bullshit posted here as if its plausible. When most people would say that it's not even rational.

Why not leave this forum and go back where you came from?

Do common, rational points of view offend you?

Perhaps a public forum isn't the place for you. One of the things about them is you'll get a variety of people discussing things.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (27 children)

So why have a fake plane if you're just going to kill everyone on the real one? Wouldn't it be simpler and cheaper just to use the real one.

I don't pretend to have all the information, including the thoughts and reasoning of the criminal minds. There is a lot of speculation about the passengers, if they even existed, etc.

Inversely: So why NOT have a fake plane? The drone would be sure not to have human error or last minute cowardice from carrying out their evil intentions.

Also related: There is only one single private airport in North America (perhaps the world) with very special privileges and circumstances. It happens to be the one that at least 2 "hijacked" planes conveniently flew directly over. I forget the actual details but perhaps /u/Jesus can recall what my recollections are mangling.

Even during the recordings (perhaps pre-recorded), some warned that it's a hoax.

Link please.

Get off your ass and do your own research. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=9%2F11+hijacked+plane+phone+call+hoax

Okay, you're claiming the fuselage was modified on the bottom? That's a big job mate. You're going to have to come up with where it was done before you're going to pick up anything approaching plausibility.

I'm not claiming it. Many folks who are experts are. I don't have to prove anything to you. Do your own research.

There's a lot deep conspiracy theory bullshit posted here as if its plausible.

These folks know MUCH MORE than most plebs do, including you, who just consume the bullshit corporate media that is shoved down their throats. The obesity crisis is a physical reflection and illustrative of the mental health and knowledgeable awareness of most of the sheeple citizenry.

When you actually investigate deeper you'll find most of what's purported on the surface is bullshit. Our world under authority is fundamentally structured on rigged systems and lies so the masses don't organize and revolt at their unfair exploitation.

Do common, rational points of view offend you?

Most common views are not based in rationality. I don't give nor take offense. I don't tolerate fools, timesucks, or inauthenticity. If you are seriously here to learn by challenging your worldview then I can applaud that and hope your worldview paradigm shift isn't too painful. But you don't come across as very genuine being a perpetual skeptic simply repeating status quo corporate media nonsense.

Perhaps a public forum isn't the place for you.

You are a Saiditter for 1 month. I've been here over 2.5 years. You don't know me. You seem like a disinfo shill and timesuck with aims to demotivate. You are not new or unique, nor do you phase me in the least. 95% of my responses are for those who read these discussions. If you get anything out of this then great.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

I don't pretend to have all the information, including the thoughts and reasoning of the criminal minds. There is a lot of speculation about the passengers, if they even existed, etc.

If you don't pretend to have all the information, one what basis do you pretend to know that the planes weren't hijacked?

Inversely: So why NOT have a fake plane?

Because the technology would have to be bespoke, and therefore expensive, and full of errors. (Unless you've got the details of the testing and development of the technolgoy.

Because there's no reason to have a fake plane.

Because getting a fake plane to the airport would require massive falsification of records.

The drone would be sure not to have human error or last minute cowardice from carrying out their evil intentions.

The cost effectiveness of a box-cutter and using an existing plane is the key. A box cutter is only about a buck. A plane is over a hundred million bucks.

Also related: There is only one single private airport in North America (perhaps the world) with very special privileges and circumstances.

Nope. There's over 4000: https://blog.privatefly.com/10-top-private-jet-airports-in-the-usa

It happens to be the one that at least 2 "hijacked" planes conveniently flew directly over.

They probably flew over a house too. And a tree. Flying over things doesn't prevent hijacking.

Get off your ass and do your own research.

This from the person who just claimed that there's only one private airport in north america.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=9%2F11+hijacked+plane+phone+call+hoax

Nothing there about people involved warning that it was a hoax. Are you sure you're not misremembering that?

I'm not claiming it.

Good. We agree on that point then.

Many folks who are experts are.

So long as we both agree that these experts are wrong, then I don't care whether we disagree that these experts exist.

I don't have to prove anything to you. Do your own research.

Fine. Let me tell you what the results of that research is: The planes were Hijacked by mostly Saudis, and flown into buildings.

Done.

These folks know MUCH MORE than most plebs do, including you

No, they're just anomaly hunting, and reaching absolutely implausible explanations.

You are a Saiditter for 1 month. I've been here over 2.5 years.

Nevertheless, if you're not interested in the views of public people, I don't think you're best in a public forum.

You are not new or unique, nor do you phase me in the least.

And yet you've asked me to leave the forum. If you're not phased in the least why would you prefer if I didn't post here?

[–]RightousBob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Nobody cares what you think. But I'll give you credit for being persistent. Just doin your job eh, mate?

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Just trying to add some rationality to the world.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Wasn't an anomaly. They were drones and I explain this in the switched tail number and UA93 flying well after its alleged crash which Pilots at pilotsfor9/11 truth have proven.

Also, Zionists rigged the towers with explosives and blew them to smithereens to start the Yinon war on terror. It wasn't Saudis, muslims or Catholic Jesuits... Zionists in high positions of power orchestrated 9/11 and then situated themselves into all the key positions to cover it up. Trump was one player in this conspiracy.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

They were drones

Right. But that lacks any plausibility, because there's nowhere these drones could have been made or tested.

Also, Zionists rigged the towers with explosives and blew them to smithereens to start the Yinon war on terror.

That's ridiculous. You can't just rig a tower with explosives. People would ask: Why are you rigging this tower with all those explosives?

And they were struck by planes, not explosives. I watched live footage of the second hit on the WTC. It was a plane.

It wasn't Saudis.

Yes it was. They know their names. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijackers_in_the_September_11_attacks