you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I have thousands of posts detailing Trumps ties to Mossad, the Foreign state of Israel LLC., tax fraud, grifting, covering up 9/11, etc. I gave you the reasons why he should be impeached under the constitution as should Biden, then they both should be tried in supreme court. Not my laws.

Worship your chabadnik pro-Haredi mafia EO officer somewhere else.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

No actual details? Just proclamations of what you have 'done'?

"Worship your chabadnik pro-Haredi mafia EO officer somewhere else."

What I am doing here, is trying to get answers out of you. Here, in your thread. After all, I must diligently study every aspect of an issue, to better come to conclusions. Why won't you help me u/Jesus? Better yet, why must you issue me away with words, instead of defending your own submission?

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I guess you're not fond of the constitution then, that's okay because netiher is neo-hamiltonian latitudinarian Trump.

I already told you that EVERY PRESIDENT HOLDS special privilages and is not a paper citizen like you and I. He might have left office but he still maintains an incorporation in US corp land. Law time travels after all.

ALL FORMER PRESIDENTS AFTER THE Former Presidents Act of 1958 are paid by fed with pensions, company security and recieve intel briefings.

So, he could still be impeached and he should be tried with the title of nobilty clause in mind for grifting with a foreign state and working with foreign agents and corporations conducting PsyOps on US citizens.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I am fond of those who can carry on conversations, and of those with the ability to express themselves. I however, am not fond of you. As you are incapable of bringing meaning to your words.

[–]Jesus[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I gave you my answers. I never even said he still holds public office in the capacity of EO but you wanted to originally debunk my claims that he can be impeached for crimes because he isn't EO of US Corp anymore. I was able to.