BREAKING: 'Significant Discrepancies' Discovered In Arizona Audit, Ballots Off Up to 17.5%, 'Likely Joe Biden Did Not Win'

submitted by scrubking from nationalfile.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Whoa! Call the cops!

35 ballets were missing from a batch!

And 18 of the missing ones were already found in another batch!

Numbers like that are nearly 0.0005% of Biden's popular vote margin of 7,059,547 votes.

[–]TheJamesRocket 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

ActuallyNot is a shill account.

[–]Sendnoodles 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Everyone who disagrees with me and values facts over feelings is a shill!

[–]TheJamesRocket 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Oh look, its a shill defending another shill. How cute.

BTW, his account is 10 days old, and he was spouting nonsense.

[–]Sendnoodles 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So you have nothing of substance say. I understand. If the best you can do is say "shill" then you've lost.

[–]TheJamesRocket 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So you have nothing of substance say.

Did you even look at the comment I was responding to? ActuallyNot was claiming that only 35 ballots were missing from one batch, and that 18 of them were found in another batch. That is complete, unadulterated bullshit.

There are VERY strict guidelines concerning the number of ballots that are stuffed into a batch: By regulations, there are supposed to be 200 ballot slips, no more, and no less. The fact that one batch had 35 less -and another box had 18 more- than specified by regulations is a red flag. These are strict procedures that were put into place long ago by government bureaucrats. In no way can you just handwave these kindof discrepencys away as a harmless mistake (as ActuallyNot tried to do).

The fact that you aren't willing to hold him to account over this misrepresentation (and indeed, that you rush to his defense) speaks volumes about your motives. And just like ActuallyNot, you seem to be totally opposed to the investigation and dismiss it as worthless from the outset. This indicates that you are a shill.

So you have nothing of substance say. I understand.

I don't think you do understand. You are either ignorant, or you are trying to obscure the truth of the matter. These kindof discrepencys are popping up very early in the Arizona investigation. If we're finding all these red flags now, what are we going to find by the time the investigation is finished? As they go through more batchs and pallets, there will undoubtedly be more discrepencys found.

If the best you can do is say "shill" then you've lost.

Lost what? The argument? Thats not up for you or anyone else to say.

The argument over election integrity will be settled by the Arizona investigation, not by commentors on Saidit.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

there are supposed to be 200 ballot slips, no more, and no less.

And literally two of them were out. By literally 35 and 18 votes respectively.

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

BTW, his account is 10 days old,

So everyone is a shill, because at one point everyone's account was 10 days old?

Or do you stop being a shill when your account gets to some age, and merely everyone was a shill?

Sensible people are trying to follow your logic.

and he was spouting nonsense.

Read the article. It's not nonsense. They are literally talking about 35 fucking votes.

In the letter, says Epshteyn on Steve Bannon’s podcast, it reveals, “Pallet five, batch 2976, 200 pink slip total, actual total 165. They are missing 35 ballots out of that batch.” He added, “35 out of 100 is 17.5%. 10 out of 200 is 5%.”

That's the argument. One batch was 35 votes out, so the total is likely to be 17.5% out. What a fucking mouth-breather.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Alright, James, where is the reliable evidence in posts from nationalfile.com ? There isn't any. A tweet, and comments on the tweet, do not constitute evidence. And if there were errors in some of the vote counting, there weren't sufficient for an appeal.

Rather than call people names, discuss the facts.