AZ Elections Witness Testifies that Private Company Was Scanning Ballots Offsite, NOT Election Workers, Then Delivering Them to Counting Center

submitted by scrubking from (thegatewaypundit.com)

all 5 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If that's true, then that's a HUGE problem.

[–]SaidOverRed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can't be honest anymore in clown world. That poor witness is about to have their life ruined.

[–]Sendnoodles 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Some highlights of this so-called smoking gun testimony:

"I’m getting out of my comfort level here talking about this. I don’t know what they are doing"

"As far as I know there were no observers there. I don’t know."

"And again I don’t know enough about it to be the witness."

"there was….I wasn’t there"

Basically she doesn't know much of anything and doesn't even seem to fully understand the counting process. This is a bunch of nothing.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"No, all the high speed scanning happens at Runbeck. So, those ballots go to Runbeck. As far as I know there were no observers there. I don’t know. I never got called to work at Runbeck. That’s all I can tell you."

There. I fixed that for you.

[–]Sendnoodles 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you read the actual transcripts, she does spend most of the time saying "I don't know", "I wasn't there", "I'm not qualified to answer that", etc. Not 100% of the time but a good 85% of the time. To use the old lefty Hilary meme, it's a nothingburger.