Reminder: At 1:48AM with 99% of all votes in, President Trump had a 117,000 vote lead, or, 3%. The US is not a 'Democratic Republic' it is a authoritarian uni-party run joke, and the 'citizens' are tax cattle.

submitted by Orangutan from (patriotdailypress.org)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Deemed by who?

By the traditional standards.

Should there be election reform? Sure. But the majority of voters got their choice for president, warts and all. It's that simple.

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Were you saying this in 2016 when spy agencies were pushing the russian collusion hoax? Bet not.

This time there was actual fraud.

Traditional standards say gender is binary and women dont have penises. You down with traditional standards now? Across the board?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is always fraud. And electronic voting machines should be banned.

But the evidence for fraud has to be sufficient enough for an investigation. For example, a claim that: "I saw a lady rescan 100 ballots" isn't sufficient evidence, because the claim from the scanning lady is that the first scan was not read.

Cambridge Analytica helped elect Trump in 2016 by spreading disinformation. Now that disinformation is spread on websites that are popular on Saidit, some of which noted on /s/ShitpostNews

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Traditional standards meant voter verification. This was removed in the 4 key states that swung the election for Biden.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

False - 0 proof of this:

https://eu.statesman.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/26/fact-check-trumps-claim-about-votes-exceeding-voters-in-swing-states/115051852/

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-list-statements-2020-electi-idUSKBN27Q2NI

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-table-voter-registration-st-idUSKBN27L2Y8

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/08/fact-check-post-argues-states-have-more-votes-than-voters/6191399002/

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/12/trump-looking-fraud-all-wrong-places/617366/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2020-55016029

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

None of the articles you linked have ANY relevance to my comment. You are trying to put up a smoke screen. Misdirection.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

So you're not reading the articles? They debunk the "voter verification was removed in key states" argument. You're welcome. What you've read before is anti-democratic.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Every one of them. I read one again just now and it hasn't changed. You're spreading disinformation on here.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

All of them give appropriate reasons and evidence for their fact checking. Sites you are using do not do this, and indeed are spreading disinformation.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

None of them talked about voter identification, only a higher vote count than eligible voters. I guess you think NBC is spreading disinformation. I'll keep that in mind.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

See my other reply to you regarding voter IDs, which is the easiest to debunk.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So how do you use an ID card for mail-in voting?