Reminder: At 1:48AM with 99% of all votes in, President Trump had a 117,000 vote lead, or, 3%. The US is not a 'Democratic Republic' it is a authoritarian uni-party run joke, and the 'citizens' are tax cattle.

submitted by Orangutan from (patriotdailypress.org)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fschmidt 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (27 children)

Democracy is unsustainable when the population becomes moronic scum.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (26 children)

Thankfully the moronic scum did not outnumber the Biden/Harris voters.

(Only idiots would not understand mail-in ballots, but that is Trump's demographic.)

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (25 children)

Only idiots would think verification though Voter ID was racist and tyrannical but vaccine passports weren’t. Its like democrats think their base is some kind of ‘moronic scum’ that wouldn’t be capable of applying for a voting ID. Oh wait that’s exactly what they think.

Hey let’s get some of this “moronic scum” off the voter rolls. I know, we’ll implement a polling test! Just to rule out the really “moronic scum”, say <85 IQ. Its the scientific thing to do, to keep the “moronic scum” from voting. That’ll be good for Biden/Harris. People with really high IQs will vote for Biden/Harris. That’s smart. I fucking love science! Do you fucking love science too?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

All ballots were varified with an ID deemed appropriate in each state.

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

Deemed by who? A Biden Harris government employee. Everone knows this was a fraud and Biden is an installed puppet of the oligarchs. Otherwise they could have audited the votes in these highly questionable corrupt voting precincts. They could have put all this to bed.

Theyve been importing “Biden/Harris voters” as fast as they can and its still not enough. All the billionaires and their MSM outlets still weren’t enough. Still had to cause an epidemic to manufacture justification to commit voter fraud. Can’t win without multiple strategies of skullduggery. Truth wouldn’t serve “Biden-Harris” because its a sham. Biden did’t want school integration because of the “racial jungle” it would cause. Biden is a rapist who penetrated a young intern against her will in a public place. Harris jokes about smoking pot while locking people up for the same. These are your working class heros— puppets of the elite who shit on the peasants.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Deemed by who?

By the traditional standards.

Should there be election reform? Sure. But the majority of voters got their choice for president, warts and all. It's that simple.

[–]InvoluntaryHalibut 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Were you saying this in 2016 when spy agencies were pushing the russian collusion hoax? Bet not.

This time there was actual fraud.

Traditional standards say gender is binary and women dont have penises. You down with traditional standards now? Across the board?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is always fraud. And electronic voting machines should be banned.

But the evidence for fraud has to be sufficient enough for an investigation. For example, a claim that: "I saw a lady rescan 100 ballots" isn't sufficient evidence, because the claim from the scanning lady is that the first scan was not read.

Cambridge Analytica helped elect Trump in 2016 by spreading disinformation. Now that disinformation is spread on websites that are popular on Saidit, some of which noted on /s/ShitpostNews

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Traditional standards meant voter verification. This was removed in the 4 key states that swung the election for Biden.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

False - 0 proof of this:

https://eu.statesman.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/26/fact-check-trumps-claim-about-votes-exceeding-voters-in-swing-states/115051852/

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-list-statements-2020-electi-idUSKBN27Q2NI

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-table-voter-registration-st-idUSKBN27L2Y8

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/08/fact-check-post-argues-states-have-more-votes-than-voters/6191399002/

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/12/trump-looking-fraud-all-wrong-places/617366/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2020-55016029

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

None of the articles you linked have ANY relevance to my comment. You are trying to put up a smoke screen. Misdirection.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

So you're not reading the articles? They debunk the "voter verification was removed in key states" argument. You're welcome. What you've read before is anti-democratic.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

What does "appropriate" mean to you? Many states didn't verify ID's and some went backwards with verification in general.

https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/a-big-deal-for-voting-pennsylvania-relaxes-mail-in-ballot-rules-will-no-longer-match-voters-signatures/

This is just one example.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

That's a disinformation website.

Voter ID laws differ in some counties of some states that are listed as not requiring an ID:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_identification_laws_in_the_United_States

Voter ID laws are improving in various states. A registered voter is already identified in documents at the polls, even if someone else tries to vote for that person. If someone is caught voting twice, he/she is prosecuted.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Ha! Dan Abrams runs a disinformation site? You crack me up with your "fake news if it doesn't fit my narrative" argument. Are you saying the information in the article is not true?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Yes.

The approaches here and above are intentionally misleading, for reasons I've noted. If you think the election was "stolen", you've been mislead. If your response is "wot - it ain't true?" This isn't my "narrative"; it's backed by 80 million voters. Voter ID laws are improving.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I am specifically talking about the rules for voter verification being changed in 2020. You are trying, as usual, to redirect.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/ballots-can-t-be-tossed-out-over-voter-signature-court-n1244585

Here's your "real news" site.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This had a minor impact, if any, on the election