all 10 comments

[–]Orangutan[S] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Link to full interview: https://youtu.be/yErKTVdETpw

We'll Know Our Disinformation Program is Complete When Everything The American Public Believes is False. - William Casey, CIA Director 1981

Adam Curtis - nonlinear warfare featuring Vladislav Surkov

[–]zyxzevn 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think the CIA is doing most of it.

[–]Vigte 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

As soon as he defected, he started to work with the CIA, since when did we start trusting spooks? When they say things we like?

PS: One of his first interviews is with G. Edward Griffin - so that says a lot about him, as well.

Edit: I'm not saying it's untrue; his characterization of their movement is spot on - however, he's not telling you the other half of the story.

[–]BeautifuLusers 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Very true. And let's mention the righteous case of dupers delight going on in his recorded interviews, and the fact that he disappeared into Canada and seems to have vanished from there. I even suspect he went home to Russia, after writing all those books. Mission accomplished. Still, it's unnerving how accurate his predictions were.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

That image's quality is about as low as a Commie's IQ.

[–]Bigs 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

What camera did you have in 1984?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

It's a computer-generated graphic, not a photograph. You mean to tell me that floating, white text with an orange quotation mark floating above it exists somewhere in reality?

[–]Bigs 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Well can you prove it doesn't, with peer-reviewed studies?

Ha!

Science.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That's not how Science works. You made the claim, so you have to prove it.

[–]Bigs 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Why are you bringing your religion into this? Scientism is a cult!