How Propaganda Replaced Journalism and the Dangers of Third-Party ‘Fact-Checkers’

submitted by scrubking from (theepochtimes.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

Case in point, the comment above about the loose screw.

Even/u/JasonCarswell agrees that/u/socks is a pharma shill, and JC gives most the extreme-benefit of the doubt; except for /u/Airbus320...

Airbus likes to mess with Jason (Jason prolly pissed him off, but IDK), but he's not pushing any agenda. Not even the L/R divide... But I digress.
socks is pharma trash.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Yes. Airbus was being a shit disturber/asstroll - not a shill. Only last month. He was immune from M7 admonishments so far as I saw. I can only guess he's found other prey or cooled off. Maybe M7 spoke to him. Maybe he saw 3 bans. I dunno.

Yes, IMO socks is the most dangerous one on here, now an outright liar about Corbett and Dore while shilling for AOC, Bernie, and corrupt science. Perhaps even the most divisive.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

socks is the dangerous one on here

Thank you, though it's impossible for me to be 'dangerous' on Saidit

now an outright liar about Corbett and Dore

Seriously? Corbett is so famous for right-wing conspiracy nonsense that Youtube has now banned him.

And my comments on Corbet and Dore are merely comments or opinions, not lies. It's not like I say - "Corbett is a Nazi" - which might be a lie, if I state it as a fact when it's not a fact, but I can say that - "I think Corbett appeals to Nazis" - as an opinion.

while shilling for AOC, Bernie, and corrupt science

Just because I LOVE AOC and Bernie, doesn't mean I am a shill. Corrupt science? No such thing. You probably refer here to corrupt corporations that use science for their own goals. There is pseudoscience, but that's not science.

Perhaps even the most divisive

Also not true because hardly anyone on Saidit agrees with me, thus I am not forming a "for" and "against" set of camps. I also do not try to get people to agree with me.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you, though it's impossible for me to be 'dangerous' on Saidit

Not if you convince someone to buy into the ruling class' eugenics programs.

Corbett is so famous for right-wing conspiracy nonsense that Youtube has now banned him.

Nonsense. The powers that be want him silenced for spoiling their secrets. It has nothing to do with the Left-Right bullshit you swallow.

And my comments on Corbet and Dore are merely comments or opinions, not lies. It's not like I say - "Corbett is a Nazi" - which might be a lie, if I state it as a fact when it's not a fact, but I can say that - "I think Corbett appeals to Nazis" - as an opinion.

It's my opinion that you are retarded or a paid shill - or both.

Corrupt science? No such thing.

Yep, retarded.

Perhaps even the most divisive

Also not true because hardly anyone on Saidit agrees with me, thus I am not forming a "for" and "against" set of camps. I also do not try to get people to agree with me.

Confirmed retarded glutton for punishment - a masochist shilling for a paycheck.