you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

and were never a problem until Trump thought he could use covid making it hard to vote

[–]Zapped 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

The rules were changed this election by people who had no authority to change the rules. These rules removed checks for fraud.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

nah it was all done fine you're just salty trump lost, but he lost due to not repealing obamacvare or building the wall, can't break all your campaign promises like that. His support was gone besides the qtards who were a minority.

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Really?

    Best we have for this information is thegatewaypundit, washingtonexaminer, and breitbart? That may answer your question about why their reports are not covered by CNN or NBC. It's normally impossible to corroborate anything posted by those websites with facts. The facts don't have to be located only on (other) MSM news media sites, but hopefully you really don't expect most people to believe anything at those websites, given their track records for disinformation and misinformation. This is more than merely right-wing bias. And perhaps this is why you note Breitbart last.

    OK - enough about the credibility of the websites. If I search for "Rules were changed this election by people who had no authority," I get links various links about rules changes before 3 November 2020. If I look for "US election Rules changed no authority", I get the same results.

    If I look at the sources you mention, I find this Detroit info:

    https://eu.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2021/03/15/judge-rules-secretary-state-bensons-ballot-signature-verification-guidance-invalid/4699927001/

    I also see links to reports on what Trump and his lawyers claimed about some of the states changing their rules. None of those reports offer any evidence of the accuracy of their claims. Indeed, courts would not hear the cases, because there was no reliable evidence submitted with the lawsuits. A politician in Michigan allowed Giuliani and his clown witness waste the time of other politicians when they presented no reliable evidence.

    In any event - I hope some of of this is acceptable as an answer to the concerns you mention. If there are better sources for the information, that would help. It's thanks to Giuliani and his failed lawsuits that many of us know there isn't much evidence about abuses of the election. There are always abuses, but they have to be significant enough for the appearance of worthwhile evidence.

    [–]thoughtcriminal 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    They're citing court rulings, this is all publicly available information. If you don't want their spin lookup the court dockets. Breitbart and the examiner are also Newsguard certified sources.

    But I wouldn't rely on any MSM source, left, right, or center. The "reliable" sources told us that Trump asked Georgia to look for election fraud based on an "anonymous" source which they've now all quietly retracted months later since it was patently false.

    [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Breitbart has connections to Israeli intelligence and the Mossad; Newsguard was founded by two Zionist Jews, one of which is a neocon. Secondly, all elections are constitutionally treasonous because you cannot have for-profit corporations selecting candidates (GOP & DNC). So, voting for executive officers of US CORP is treasonous. But nobody really cares anymore, espeically not congress so vote for the best corporate officier that will lobby for you. But remember, they do not work or represent you when they are receiving money from privtate corporations.

    Tough pill to swallow but it is the truth. A lawyerly hidden truth.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Newsguard

    Breitbart notes that Newsguard does not approve of them. Something about Bill Gates controlling the world, or similar idiocy.

    Thanks for telling me about Newsguard, whcih I'll start using along with these:

    https://uk.pcmag.com/security-4/119900/how-to-spot-fake-news-online

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    fake news sorry

    [–]Zapped 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Sure.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    you got duped

    [–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Sure.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      lol nah he tried to stop voters from voting, was blatant