you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

How about you quote us the rules you take issue with? In the meantime, I will reiterate my actual point. No Biden supporters watched his speech. Only Trump and Q followers watched his speech.

[–]NodeIndependent 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

No hate speech.

Something like that, but I deleted the tab and no longer go back there. People prohibiting whatever they label as 'hate speech' are my enemy. And unless you're far more leftist than you're letting on, they're probably your enemy too.

No Biden supporters watched his speech.

There were probably a few. But it's plausible and unfortunate that Trump supporters take jao biaden seriously enough to watch him read the speech his handlers put in front of him.

The Trump gambit worked way too well for the people running things. It sucked all the power out of the right, and paved the way for their great reset.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The Trump gambit worked way too well for the people running things. It sucked all the power out of the right, and paved the way for their great reset.

Which is why they needed to cheat in the election, and get all of the corrupt republicans to illegally ratify the election results? That makes no sense. That makes no sense at all. Like fingering your self as a suspect to prove your innocence. They've had this on lock down for the past 24+ years before Trump, why would they expose themselves like that?

[–]NodeIndependent 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I don't pretend to know or understand the tactics used by these various entities, but I can guess based on a look at the results they obtain. What do we see in this 'biden takeover' event? The right is more demoralized and powerless than ever before. The left and their puppet masters are free to virtually do whatever they want.

So what did openly cheating like that do for them? It was a slap in the face to conservatives, the right, and anyone who still believed in the constitution and the rule of law. It sent a strong message that the game has changed, and you better stfu and accept the new normal. (this paragraph could be expanded, but that covers the basics)

What explains Trump's role in all this? If you remember the day after the 2016 election, Trump met the press and made clarifying statements on video about his thinking. It's been awhile, so just paraphrasing: "Hillary is my good friend, the Clintons are great people, and no one is getting arrested and going to jail". His "You'd be in jail" was what tipped me over the edge into actually bothering to vote again. It became immediately apparent that Trump was just an extraordinarily skilled bullshitting reality television actor (coincidently my last previous vote) who played his target demographics 'like no one ever had before'.

In the following months and years, his jewish supremacy and ownership by the MIC became openly obvious, and only unseen by the left TDS sufferers who hated him, and the right TDS sufferers who loved him. Trump created a tremendous amount of TDS on a daily basis. Trump was owned, and he played the game all the way to the end. He sucked the supposedly conservative right into his amoral orbit, and destroyed them.

That was the purpose of installing Trump. Look at the results objectively. If one began to examine his life and the behaviors he exhibited before and after taking office, 'there's a lot of material there'. The end result was that he did maximum damage to the conservative right, and paved the way for everything that's happening now.

This could be polished, and tightened up with citations of specific acts and such. Do you know much about the "13 families who own the world"? You never hear about them in the media they own, but I tend to believe reaching that position would require some sophisticated smarts, and would give one an extraordinary level of control over world events. Maybe I'm just a sucker for coincidence theories, but there's some odd stuff happening out there.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't pretend to know or understand the tactics used by these various entities, but I can guess based on a look at the results they obtain.

The first half of your sentence contradicts not only your entire reply. But the second half the the sentence it is in. I won't debate anything you have to say, if you can't even get through a single sentence without contradicting yourself.

[–]NodeIndependent 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's no contradiction there. But it's probably best to not continue if you think there is.