you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[removed]

    [–]bobbobbybob 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

    he went out of his way today, to warn me for promoting capital execution as a solution to pedophila.

    [–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Does that show favoritism for pedophiles or do you think he would have that same position if you said we should go out and execute rioters?

    [–]the-ham-bummer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Does that show favoritism for rioters or do you think he would have that same position if you said we should go out and execute people parking their car in the wrong place?

    Hint: pedo < rioter

    [–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Your argument is retarded. The "no advocating violence" rule has nothing to do with a hierarchy of criminals.

    [–]the-ham-bummer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    If you say "mr. X is gonna treat a subject differently when pedos are involved", you say something I daresay natural, so it's difficult to derive strong deductions from common premises.