you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Well the wording they are using blames Trump for the "current crisis". Which can mean almost anything. And the original link directs to a twitter account that says that the strikes were carried out at "President Biden's direction"... But I honestly can't rule out the possibility that the DoD acted on policies implements by Trump to push back against Iranian forces in Syria launching attacks on US forces in Iraq by Kata'ib Hezbollah and Kata'ib Sayyid al-Shuhada, as stated. The silence on the part of Syria can either imply passive consent, or just a need on Syria's behalf to keep the peace amongst their citizens.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

they are stating that Trump's sanctions on Iran directly lead to the situation

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I actually don't doubt this.

As the Biden administration has ties to Iran, and according to Jack Poisobiec, Kamla Harris was not aware of the strikes, we are left with a great number of Questions as to how involved Biden actually is on this matter. These actions could actually be to enforce current peace agreements. This is of course speculation on my part, but the Department of Defenses statement of "President Biden's direction" is yet another vague term that could mean almost anything. What did he direct them to do? To commit to airstrikes, or to simply follow current mandates?

Now, why would Don Jr. ask this: https://patriots.win/p/12hkOzIFBC/don-jr-is-a-fucking-savage-just-/c/

I am sure that the Biden Administration will not admit to following mandates from the former president, but that is what a sitting president is expected to do. Especially if it is to enforce agreements amongst allies. And since they will not admit to anything Trump doing as being for the betterment of our country, or the middle east. The best they can do is spin this as an attack on Syria, caused by Trump's sanctions. Which again, isn't entirely 'wrong'. Oh, and... Call it a crisis... Whatever.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

it would be hilarious if this is actually the command in chief (trump) in action, still. the circus would have gone meta and awesome if that was the case