Florida restaurant goes viral for 'face diapers not required' mask policy

submitted by christnmusicreleasesIndependent from nypost.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RightousBob 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (29 children)

You can speak for yourself and not for me. When I say personal freedom I mean just that. You want to wear a mask? Wear a mask. You don't? Don't. You want to require masks in your store? Require it. Lockdowns and state mandates are unconstitutional, period. People will operate on self preservation the majority of the time but when the state gets involved it always makes things worse.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (19 children)

/u/socks is a pharma shill. Literally.

He's not going to concede anything that his paycheck disagrees with. He's on the take.

Here's a recent exchange where I conclusively call him out.

It couldn't be more obvious what he is.

There are numerous shills here. Most aren't as stupid or obvious, as socks.

socks is a shameless turd.

If you want to push back, then hit the save button under his retarded comments, so you can reference them later, and call him out whereever you see his bullshit, and cite the saved example(s).

He'll eventually get fired for being worthless.

Although, I'm starting to think he may be a bot, because shameless hypocrisy is difficult for most to personally accept.

[–]RightousBob 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

Hey Tom,

Thank you for the warning but I am fully aware of what /u/socks is. Like you say, it's obvious. I knew the second I read their first comment that they were a shill piece of shit.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Thank you for the warning but I am fully aware of what /u/socks is.

I figured you knew.

Nobody with a grey cell comes to this site and believes masks work.

[–]RightousBob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What is a grey cell?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Let me guess: you two were banned from SubReddits because you broke the usual rules about calling someone a shill, right? Either that, or for spreading anti-vax disinformation (gets people perma-banned real quick). At Saidit you're not supposed to drag down the discussion with ad hominems, but that's all you do. No worries - you're safe here. No one's gonna melt the wittle snowflake....

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Something

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Plz wear 4 masks when you drive

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Stop bullying, Bob.

Contribute or STFU.

[–][deleted]  (8 children)

[removed]

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    Alrighty then.

    Is it that difficult to wear a mask? (Certainly not. And this helps keep businesses open even if one thinks science is a hoax and that I. Newton was a pharma shill &c.)

    If instead one wears a diaper over his/her face, what's the point of that?

    Are people who don't want to war masks narcissistic snowflake MAGAtards who actually want to restrict the freedoms of others, and continue sucking every last drop or propaganda from the right-wing MSM & social media, with absolutely no interest in the 500,000 COVID deaths in the US, many of them caused by sociopaths who wanted the freedumbs to infect people whereever posssible?

    [–]herberthoover 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    is it that difficult for you to not refer to my political comrades as Tards? yes, actually it is impossible for your party to exist without using insults, because you have nothing positive to offer..

    is it that difficult to wear a mask?

    let me ask you this? is it that difficult for your to shove a broom up your ass?

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    yes, actually it is impossible for your party to exist without using insults, because you have nothing positive to offer.

    You do realise that these insults have been the only real MO by Republicans for decades. The problem with central-right, moderates and liberals is that they're too nice. I agree with the alt-right that we shouldn't worry about PC language. Take the damn gloves off.

    is it that difficult to wear a mask?

    let me ask you this? is it that difficult for your to shove a broom up your ass?

    I don't know. You tell me. Probably can't go to the grocery like that...

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [removed]

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      First result when searching on Youtube:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZRXESV3R74

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [removed]

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Cool

        You might walk like a duck, but you are at least sweeping the places you walk past.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [removed]

          [–]RightousBob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Ha ha, thanks for the chuckle hours old sock puppet account.

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

          You said this:

          I support personal freedom.

          Which means that you would want everyone to have their 'personal freedom', right?

          That works when people wear masks, which is so simple that anyone can easily do it without any problem. Case closed.

          [–]RightousBob 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

          The CASE IS NOT closed as I fundamentally DISAGREE with you.

          I believe people should have the FREEDOM to make those choices for themselves and NOT have the state or people like YOU dictate what they must or mustn't do. I know that opinion goes against your preprogrammed narrative and JIDF flow chart but you will just have to deal with the fact that not everyone thinks like you (if in fact you think at all), and I will use my personal FREEDOM of speech to continue to say it regardless of how you try to spin my words.

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

          I appreciate that this is the argument you had planned to make all along. My point is that there is absolutely no scenario where this statement:

          I support personal freedom.

          Means that you do this at the expense of the personal freedom of another person, and especially a person who could get COVID19 from you (while you cry about wearing a mask, because it doesn't matter if grandma dies, as long as you don't have to wear a mask).

          To avoid this problem, you could say, for example:

          I support my personal freedom at the expense of everyone else.

          In that manner, the personal freedoms of others do not matter to you, and no one can argue that you seem to genuinely care about personal freedom in the broader sense of that term.

          [–]RightousBob 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

          NOPE, you missed the bus again. I'll will tell YOU what I believe in terms a monkey could understand.

          You want to wear a mask? Wear one. You don't want to wear a mask? Don't. You want to lock your self in your house for a year? Do it. You want to go about life as usual? Do it.

          Your well being is NOT my responsibility, it is YOUR responsibility. Besides if you are wearing a mask and are vaccinated you are protected right? I think you SHOULD have the freedom to do those things. My not doing them does not stop you from doing them.

          By the way, when you say "blah blah blah means" that is simply your interpretation. You have NO authority to define my point of view, but I will happily support your FREEDOM to speak in opposition to it.

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Part of the problem is that your 'right' is another person's 'responsibility', if indeed you wish to have that right at the expense of others.

          See for example, Alasdair MacIntyre's 'After Virtue' and 'Whose Justice? Which Rationality?'

          If instead you accept the 'responsibility' that comes with supporting the 'right' of 'personal freedom' of another person, you and the other person succeed.

          If instead you require others to be responsible for your 'right' of 'personal freedom', this is obviously not ethical. They don't owe you.

          [–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

          Crock.

          [–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

          Flawed logic. You sound like someone in faith.

          [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

          Alright, then, let's do this with a syllogism.

          I support personal freedom

          Everyone deserves their personal freedom

          I support everyone

          Or

          I support personal freedom for everyone

          This only works if I wear a mask (or others may lose their freedoms)

          I support the wearing of masks

          [–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

          Everyone [should have] freedom

          That's all we need.