Gabbard: Section 230 lets Big Tech 'undermine our constitutional rights'

submitted by [deleted] from youtube.com

all 5 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

don't have the right to call for violence and insurrection

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

She should have been a finalist in the primaries.

If the democrats didnt cheat her by changing the rules as soon as she qualified, she would have.

Even the usual MSNBX Shill ari melber called it out.

since Bloomberg had been self-funding his campaign, he was considered ineligible to participate despite his rise in the polls- that is until the DNC changed the rules.

Melber argued that it's a "larger democracy question," pointing to criticisms made by billionaire Tom Steyer and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, both who aren't qualified for the upcoming debate but slammed the rule change since it allegedly allows Bloomberg to "buy" his way onto the debate stage.

"It's not fair to change the rules in the middle. That would be true if it was the government changing the voting laws in the middle or either political party or any political party in the middle of a primary. And I think that's obvious from a position of fairness."

The DNC is even more corrupt than the republicans are - their last primary was a fair one.

[–]madcow-5 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed. Everyone I knew who had any exposure to her liked her. It was only people who I know tend to soak up MSM and default to agreeing with whatever they say who dismissed her. Then they managed to weasel her out before most normies got exposure.