Sen. Rand Paul Has Fiery Debate With George Stephanopoulos: “You say we’re all liars. You just simply say we’re all liars.”...“In Wisconsin, tens of thousands of absentee votes had only the name on them and no address. Historically those were thrown out, this time they weren’t."

submitted by Orangutan from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

If it was "stolen" then why won't R. Paul say so? Because it wasn't technically "stolen". This is a fact.

And as we and Stephanopoulos know, elections are problematic. Do you think all of the votes for Trump were appropriate votes?

Note that Trump also didn't get the popular vote in 2016. The Electoral College "stole" the election for him in 2016.

Yes, we need election reform, and have needed since the time of electronic voting machines. This is not what R. Paul was asked about.

[–]Feldheld 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Trump did not get the electoral college in 2016 for the same reason he lost 2020 due to election fraud. In the densely populated Democrat strongholds the whole voting infrastructure is strictly in Democrat hands and GOP or independent observers are too few to begin with and even those few are routinely prevented from doing their job. This allows fraud on a massive scale since nobody has the power to stop it, and no judge has the balls to expose himself to the media / social media mob. Biden didnt even get 60 million legal votes. Legally, Trump would have won by a landslide.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Corporate shill news companies that have repeated this lie on a regular basis should be required to put OPINION in red letters over the faces of the crooks telling you this nonsense. The reason Trump's lawyers lost every case is because they had NO FUCKING EVIDENCE. If you sent that asshat money, he's keeping it. His lawyers are complaining that they've not been paid.

[–]Feldheld 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Thats a blunt lie.

None of these judged even dared looking at the evidence. All these cases were thrown out by some "standing" argument which is a judges way of saying "Im too cowardly to take the responsibility for something as big this".

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes - they did - and found that the lawsuit had NO MERIT. The lawauits were reviewed. They were deemed unworthy of a court hearing, because they NEVER INCLUDED APPROPRIATE EVIDENCE.

[–]Feldheld 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well, what else could you do other than keep lying and doubling down. Lies are what your whole world is built upon.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No need to be infantile. How it is lie? To repeat a comment elsewhere in this thread:

Are you a lawyer? Do you know a lawyer? Are you repeating what R. Paul said? Could R. Paul be misleading you?

Discovery is not necessary in the preparatory stage of a civil procedure. There are several steps before discovery is necessary.

Most of those lawsuits were obviously not ready for discovery because they contained no reasonable evidence. This is commonly known.