72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered “Potential Terrorists” In Official Government Documents- You can now be considered a “potential terrorist” just because of your religious or political beliefs.

submitted by christnmusicreleasesIndependent from activeprp.law.blog

all 23 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]bjam27 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Actual fascism

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

...by the blogger and his sources (Judicial Watch &c, using a basic 2011 Equality training document. Run for the hills!)

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

When actual terrorists call their victims terrorists to justify terrorism.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or when terrorists claim that they are the victims of "the Man". (Pathetic.)

[–]RM-Goetbbels 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fuck. I am the first twelve and fully support the last 60.

"Those that talk about “individual liberties”

Any government who believes those 72 reasons make someone a terrorist IS THE ENEMY of The People. That's no shit. We are Americans. Every one of those items is a God given right for us to be, do or say.

Biden can go fuck himself.

[–]jykylsin2034 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

China? Nope it's USA

[–]GConly 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Isn't Biden funded by the Chinese though?

I'm guessing getting America to act like China is one way to get America off China's back about their own totalitarianism.

[–]jykylsin2034 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Woooosh

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I bet we're gonna see in the next four years how the ENTIRE russiagating conspir was what byeden was doing all ALONG !!

https://www.npr.org/2020/08/07/900245813/u-s-intelligence-warns-china-opposes-trump-reelection-russia-works-against-biden

In a joint statement, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., chair of House Intelligence Committee, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi... expressed frustration at how Evanina lumped the countries' actions together.

Instead, the lawmakers said, intelligence officials should share more specific information to "allow voters to appraise for themselves the respective threats posed by these foreign actors, and distinguish these actors' different and unequal aims, current actions, and capabilities."

https://nlpc.org/2020/05/21/complaint-filed-against-university-of-pennsylvania-and-biden-center-for-undisclosed-china-mega-donations/

Super shilling, IMO.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]jet199 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    They will say "be kind" on them.

    [–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    A trans flag with a happy face on it ;)

    The back is a boot stomping on a woman protesting for her god-given rights.

    [–]nolocus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    "But the Obama administration removed all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” was applied to large groups of American citizens."

    Once the language was changed and whistleblowers criminalized this was how they went after dissenters, ANY dissenters obstructing their power grab. It's been covert since? The only difference, It's now overt. At least I'll have company. I wrote my state reps asking if I'm on a list three weeks ago. A waste of time?

    [–]NodeIndependent 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Watch out for the Easy Celler marketing rabbit hole. Sounds like it 'might' be good preparedness advice, but it's taking forever to get to the actual pitch.

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/38477829-easy-cellar (it's this, "and more!")

    [–]Lahontan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The links in the article go to some air force training document. I didn't peruse the while thing but it didn't seem like it referred to anything the article was talking about. How about the actual EO's or whatever know classified freedom loving people as terrorists?

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    No - this is a lie.

    2011 document regarding 'Equal Opportunities' training, uploaded and context changed by these assholes:

    https://www.judicialwatch.org

    [–]Velocity 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Perhaps you should elaborate on your opinion.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

    OK - let's start with the title:

    72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered “Potential Terrorists”

    No - this is a lie (there is also no reliable evidence for this)

    In Official Government Documents- You can now be considered a “potential terrorist” just because of your religious or political beliefs.

    No - this is a lie (there is also no reliable evidence for this)

    Let's consider the source: https://activeprp.law.blog

    Klark Jouss is an ultra-right-wing blogger and organizer devoted to spreading misinformation and disinformation.

    He also did this: https://sennwoop.home.blog/author/yourbrohome1f4fb5076f/

    And this: https://clickwooz.wordpress.com/author/yourbrohome1f4fb5076f/

    And this: https://sevenwoop.wordpress.com/author/yourbrohome1f4fb5076f/

    As well as this: https://allsexpress.wordpress.com/

    And: https://my72.news.blog/author/yourbrohome1f4fb5076f/

    Perhaps consider also who posted this: christnmusicreleases

    Consider that the sources used by Jouss were provided by Judicial Watch, Inc., which is a well-established company devoted to spreading disinformation. They are very well funded and produce impressive reports that are intended to trick people into believing their conspiracy theories. The result is that people who read thes lies argue with people who are duped by them, and in the meantime, the US is now 27 trillion in debt because of tax cuts and other abuses by the 1%. Who funded the disinformation campaigns? The 1% Who will pay for the loans from China? You and me. Why did it get this bad? Because we were duped into arguing about facts by websites that are corporate and special interest shills. Judicial Watch and Jouss are helping the 1% fleece the 99%. Judicial Watch gets an 'Equality' training document from 2011 and makes it seem like a terrorist checklist, and then tries to scare others into believing that they'll be on it. Saidit, watch your backs. ...

    [–]Velocity 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    What then is the intended context for mentioning a varied and disparate range of ideologies in regards to equal opportunities training?

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    The process in Human Resources at universities and elsewhere has been updated and expanded - due more recently to BLM - to something now called, 'diversity training', or similar, addressing approaches to under-represented and marginalized groups and how to deal with them. Thus equality and equity are now under the diversity umbrella for HR training of staff, who have to attend a 3 hour training exercise and answer exam questions thereafter. The potential problems they list are in that 'equailty' document linked above, as well as the approaches of racists, sexists, micro-aggression, and especially the importance of the "outcome" of one's actions, by contrast with the relatively unimportant "intention".

    [–]Velocity 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Would partly agree with you. This article has been around for awhile. It's understood that the 1% frequently agitate both sides of the contrived political spectrum via editorialized/sensationalized mis/disinfo in order to increase conflict and division.

    While still taking the document at face value. If being read correctly, it still stands as an endorsed gov document that categorizes anyone that "ideologically colors outside the lines" as being dangerous. However the headline leans towards being at least alarmist considering the context.

    [–]Vagina7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    this is refreshing.

    [–]PatDaddysFShack 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    White men engage in terrorism.