you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

How can you say that, Nick?

MBFC provides reliable evidence in the 'detailed report' in the link above (https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-waking-times/)

Regarding Just the Facts Daily, see the detailed report here: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/just-facts-daily/

[–]EvilNick 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

Wow using MBFC to fact check the site that's fact checking them.this is like a mirror in a mirror in a mirror.

MBFC is notoriously biased and wrong.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Not to keep bothering you, Nick, but I can find no evidence of this: "MBFC is notoriously biased and wrong."

[–]EvilNick 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Then you're not looking

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

No need to be Evil, Nick

(It doesn't hide the fact that do not have reliable evidence).

[–]EvilNick 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Or you don't want to look or believe anything

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Not my job to help you with your argument and supposed evidence, if it exists (I looked, out of respect for the discussion; was curious; nevermind)

[–]EvilNick 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

https://climatechangedispatch.com/media-bias-fact-check-site-served-cease-and-desist/

There are a plethora of these articles out there. Stop using Google.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Good grief. Seems we're arguing over facts again. The site you metion: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/climate-change-dispatch

I appreciate that you will not like the site I've mentioned. The detailed report at this site, and its links, are more reliable than the "the take-down letter issued today to Mr. Van Zandt." It is good to see their response to Media Bias Fact Check, but as we've seen, the latter website has not removed the items that were part of the letter to Van Zandt. If Media Bias Fact Check were wrong, their report on climatechangedispatch.com would be removed or substantially updated, but this has not happened.

[–]EvilNick 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

lol more reliable because you like it more. MBFC is a completely left wing liberal shill site. They do no real research for their arguments, and it basically one guys deciding what he likes and how he feels things are leaning. Also using MBFC to make your counter argument is pretty shite.