you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (18 children)

pro-trans is not anti-science. Anti-science is denying: climate change, tobacco safety, vaccine efficacy, evolutionary theory, mask wearing...

[–]jet199 19 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

How is denying the male and female sex binary exist not anti science.

Science isn't only what your political side supports, you know.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

This is more of a cultural issue than a science issue. Otherwise nobody is truly male or female until they give birth to kids.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

How about, for the sake of argument, we say people with a cock are men, and people without a cock are women.

Obviously pinoy lady boys get a pass. But it's the only pass.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I wouldn't use porn as a starting point for gender issues.

[–]FediNetizen 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Otherwise nobody is truly male or female until they give birth to kids.

That's not how any of this works. Ugly women are still women. "Five foot nothing" manlets are still men. Your sex is determined by your chromosomal arrangement, and isn't contingent on whether or not you successfully breed.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The science is way more complicated than that.

https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab/articles/gonads-xy

[–]Comatoast 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Did you really just bring a fucking podcast link to an argument about science?

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Must be a chapo turd

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yep. A science podcast. If you delve into it a bit more, you can find the peer reviewed science the podcast story is based on. They aren't talking to anonymous 4chan trolls.

[–]Comatoast 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As a general rule, you can expect that most people are not interested in listening to an entire podcast to pluck the factual information out. If there were peer reviewed medical articles, link those directly if you want anyone to give your arguments the time of day.

[–]wristaction 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

In fact yes, and much of the left has abandoned the pseudoscience and retreated to constructivist arguments, but one still winds up confronted by Vauch types who believe that transgenderism is validated by some kind of advanced science you're ignorant of because you're not intellectual enough to have read about it in the science section of Pink News.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I think I am intellectual enough to get it. If you are a real intellectual yourself, and you review your "intellectual" anti-trans cohorts, you will find plenty of QANON, young earth creationists, and anti-vax. If that is your idea of pro-science intellectuals, I suggest you read some Carl Sagan.

https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab/articles/gonads-xy

[–]wristaction 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

In other words, in the index of gullibility and susceptibility to propaganda, Q believers are more grounded than believers of trans pseudoscience.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Your the one who is confused about trans because you can't overcome what you were told when you were 5. By the way, there is no such thing as santa.

[–]wristaction 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

The real crackup is that shitlibs also have "advanced math" which proves that 2+2!4 so that route of parody reference is closed off to rational people.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/08/31/harvard-promotes-claim-that-225/

Let us know when the lesbian poetry professors determine what additional gametes transgendereds contribute to reproduction.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trans are awesome at contributing to reproduction. Drag queen storytime is a quintessential part of modern childhood.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Trans are pedos who should be on prison

[–]MyLongestJourney 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

nobody is truly male or female until they give birth to kids.

Male = The member of the species who has the ability to produce the smaller,mobile gamete.

Female = The member of the species who has the ability to produce the larger,immobile gamete .

That's it.