Day One, Biden Destroys Girls' Sports With Anti-Science Executive Order

submitted by christnmusicreleasesIndependent from thefederalist.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]StillLessons 32 insightful - 3 fun32 insightful - 2 fun33 insightful - 3 fun -  (71 children)

What a slap in the face to biological women.

You should never be forced to do this, but if this anti-female environment proves durable, I wonder what the possibilities are for creating private clubs with private funding where only biological females are allowed to compete. Women, you unfortunately may need to look into this. Otherwise, as the headline says, girls' sports are no longer allowed.

What a mindset. They really hate the universe as it is naturally configured, just hate it.

[–]GConly 22 insightful - 3 fun22 insightful - 2 fun23 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

, I wonder what the possibilities are for creating private clubs with private funding where only biological females are allowed to compete.

What's going to happen in athletics is a shit load of male athletes will enter women's races, either for profit or giggles. Then we'll have a year or two with no female winners, and the bulk of the population will kick up a stink.

It's sad to say that it may now be illegal to form women only spaces, which includes changing rooms.

Women are a lot less confrontational than men, they'll just start withdrawing from using facilities that allow men into areas where they are vulnerable. Gyms and pools etc that have single stall changing will be the only ones women will use after a bit.

Then businesses that lose female customers will start kicking up a stink about the cost of changing their facilities to single occupancy stalls.

Women, you unfortunately may need to look into this.

We've been kicking up a stink since 2017. Made some progress in the UK.

[–]EvilNick 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Women are a lot less confrontational than men

I agree with everything but this statement

[–]GConly 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

On average we are.

Not including myself, raging testosterone fueled bitch that I am.

But when there is some kind of confrontation that could turn nasty in some way women are just less likely to deal with it head on. Hard to say whether it's down to innate difference or just because we learn in our teens it's just not a good idea to challenge men because of their violence. After all, one decent punch from a man can kill a woman.

[–]SilenceThem_Consume 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And in the same genre, one decent grope from Joe Biden will be IGNORED by the entire media!

Picture on the left; my other source of this image has for some reason been removed recently.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]jet199 3 insightful - 7 fun3 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 7 fun -  (2 children)

    Or because he lives with his mother.

    [–]EvilNick 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    bet I make more and own more houses than you, and your mom........... combined

    [–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Exactlly

    [–]EvilNick 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    ghay

    [–]369 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (28 children)

    You can have Feminism/Gynocentrism or you can have realism and Traditional Values.

    You cannot have your cake and eat it too.

    [–]StillLessons 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Too many "-isms". This isn't about any -ism. It's about respecting objective reality and accommodating ourselves to it rather than trying to legislate it away to fit the yelling of a small group of people who find themselves unable to function in a society designed around the 99+% of people who accept reality as it has been conceived of for thousands of years.

    [–]369 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    It seems we completely agree. I don't see the point in sperging over my choice of words.
    Boring.

    [–]StillLessons 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    The problem with "-isms" is that everyone defines them differently. One person's feminism is another's "anti-trans". By using broad terms such as these, a whole bunch of unrelated arguments get brought in where they are not helpful, and the water gets muddied.

    [–]369 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I don't see a lot of difference between the two "-isms".

    [–]jet199 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

    Which traditional values?

    [–]PlanetoftheClowns 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

    "Traditional" values. The statement was quite clear. You're obviously a retard progressive troll.

    [–]jet199 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (11 children)

    So the traditional values of the Etoro tribe in Papua New Guinea it is then.

    [–]PlanetoftheClowns 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

    Go dilate you obtuse piece of shit.

    [–]jet199 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I'm not the one being obtuse.

    Which traditional values?

    Which country, which culture?

    [–]FediNetizen 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

    I love how he had a real point here, and in responding all you've done is prove it by being completely unable to answer a simple question.

    [–]PlanetoftheClowns 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    he had a real point here

    So, being purposely obtuse by pretending not to know the context of the statement passes for a "real point" these days, eh? You should go join him. Maybe you two can scissor while you dilate.

    [–]FediNetizen 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Or, I can repeat the question, and watch as you struggle to come up with an answer as you have already been doing.

    What traditional values?

    [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    🤣

    [–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    I think its a real female that one 🤢

    [–]PlanetoftheClowns 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    It has replied to other comments I've made with the same obtuse attitude. Definitely a troll. I care not what it is.

    [–]Comatoast 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    It's not obtuse to wonder precisely what tradition that you're referring to in regards to traditional values. Many functional cultures have different traditional values.

    So what traditional values are you referring to? Which specific culture and time period?

    [–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    We will not tell

    [–]wecandobetter 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Personal attack is quite low on the pyramid of debate, and is widely regarded a 'point lost' in internet argument rules.

    [–]wristaction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    The ones Feminism set out to dismantle.

    [–]369 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    It's become abundantly clear that you yourself hate all of the things you insist everyone else believes you are passionate about.

    [–][deleted]  (6 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]copenseethe 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

      It is s point worth making that the door was opened for this sort of thing when we contested the right of men to have private clubs that exclude women.

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]wristaction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          The substance of the prevailing argument was that men in men's spaces have casual interactions which influence professional outcomes and that the existence of men's only spaces therefore generates professional and civic disadvantages for women.

          Thusly, a women's only space would generate professional and civic disadvantages for trans women, who are more oppressed, per the experts.

          Of course, you could always just pass the buck all the way up to white men. I guess that's why "gender critical" advocates cling to a position within the medium-far left. But that's not going to obstruct tranny's ultimate victory over their objections.

          [–]369 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          On the contrary, I think the correlation between the two ideologies is stark.

          [–]madcow-5 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (23 children)

          Lol, it’s what they voted for.

          [–]EvilNick 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

          im willing to best most of them didnt

          [–]jet199 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

          He literally said he would do this on his first day in office then he did it.

          Biden has personal charities and one of g he main things their donate to is groups which lobby for the medical transition of kids.

          [–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          He literally said he would do this on his first day in office

          When did he say it?

          [–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          https://saidit.net/s/GenderCritical/comments/66y5/bidens_first_move_in_office/

          [–]madcow-5 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

          They know what the left is. There’s no excuse.

          [–][deleted]  (6 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]wecandobetter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

            I don't think very many women on Gendercritical have voted DFL in an election cycle or two.

            [–]wristaction 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

            Which is quite a conundrum. Are there any left/center-left parties which are not pro-tranny? Even the GOP is pro-tranny. The first act of this purportedly ultra-right SCOTUS majority under Barrett was to punt a case about tranny bathroom access. Even the Alt-Light, at the height of its influence, felt obligated to adopt a token based tranny.

            [–]wecandobetter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

            Yeah I think everyone is kind of looking out the window, realizing there's literally no one representing a majority of our interests, and regrouping. It's not going to be more the same old going forward.

            [–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            The truth is that the only two candidates who were defending women and our troops (Bernie and Tulsi) were systematically undermined by EVERY democrat, up to and INCLUDING pres Obama. There is no HOPE for progressive ideas near that coven of jackalls.

            [–]wecandobetter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            I hope we see more from Tulsi Gabbard. I've come to respect her a lot.

            [–]madcow-5 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Alright, this is true. Most of the people vaguely paying attention from a distance think it's all a bunch of reasonable benevolent stuff and the people against it are all just racist.

            But I think these people need to be shamed. Not for their views, but for how uninformed they are, yet voted anyway. They're the wind behind the sails, even if they're not steering the ship.

            [–]nuhuhno 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

            NAWALT. Not all women voted for Biden. But, go ahead and gloat that ALL women will have to suffer for this. After all, nO MEN vOtED fOR biDEn, right?

            [–]madcow-5 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

            NAWALT

            Well, duh..

            You're getting upset over nothing. Unless you're upset that you voted for Biden, which you should be. Also, the men who voted Biden get FAR less respect from me than the women. Women at least have nurturing tendencies. They're more likely to be progressive. This isn't some insult this is just reality.

            [–]nuhuhno 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Not upset, just ribbing ya.

            I didn't resist throwing some snark in with facts.

            ;)

            [–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            the men who voted Biden get FAR less respect from me than the women. Women at least have nurturing tendencies. They're more likely to be progressive.

            Biden

            Progressive

            😂😂👌

            IF you voted for the chick who unlawfully kept people locked up, you are not a progressive, you are wannabe stalinists.

            [–]madcow-5 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            That’s what progressives are. Have you been to a city or a college in the last five years?

            [–]EvilNick 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            I mean didnt vote for them, not didnt know

            [–]GConly 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

            We really didn't. It's been sneaked in via sneak add ons to legislation mostly.

            [–]madcow-5 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            There’s no pretending to be blind to what the left is at this point.

            I get being tricked into supporting a bunch of marxist intersectional stuff by attending the first (and only the first) women’s march, but you know what the left is now.

            If you voted for Biden, you voted for the cult.

            [–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            There’s no pretending to be blind

            Most people still watch MSM. Dont be a fookin cunt mate just because they are still fooled by anderson cooper's red propoganda. EDUCATE, dont be a cuckold fuck.

            [–]jet199 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

            It's been known he would do this for months.

            https://www.saidit.net/s/GenderCritical/comments/66y5/bidens_first_move_in_office/

            [–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Oh no, I'm talking internationally.

            [–]emptiedriver 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

            I've seen pro trans people say that they wouldn't accept trans sports leagues, but they'd be fine with "transphobic" teams starting on their own - meaning that for women who don't want to compete against men, it would be seen as politically hateful to join such a group, and therefore many young female athletes would feel peer pressured to compete in the broader "women and trans women" group, even if trans women seemed to win at a much higher rate than their percentage of that population would predict. Maybe there would be a tipping point if it became too obviously dominated by second tier male athletes, but I don't know that women would find it feasible to separate to a biological-only group before that, just due to the way it would be represented.

            [–]wristaction 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            Isn't the appropriate venue for trannies the Special Olympics?

            [–]nuhuhno 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            No coercion in that at all. "Let us beat you or get labeled." /s

            Bet female athletes would go that route just for the sake of getting to do sports without the risk of serious injuries!

            [–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            hey'd be fine with "transphobic" teams starting on their own - meaning that for women who don't want to compete against men, it would be seen as politically hateful to join such a group, and therefore many young female athletes would feel peer pressured to compete in the broader "women and trans women" group, even if trans women seemed to win at a much higher rate than their percentage of that population would predict.

            'Just get 3 billion dollars and start a new league so that trans women can feel nice'

            [–]wristaction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            White male gentiles weren't permitted to have exclusive spaces. What makes you think you're allowed?

            https://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/04/sports/golf-the-high-price-of-victory.html

            [–]SilenceThem_Consume 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            They really hate the universe as it is naturally configured, just hate it.

            Nah, they got more people to vote for Joe by making this an 'IMPORTANT' issue, most MSMlibs dont know whatever the hell they are voting for.

            Joe increased the prisons, helped throw people out of their homes, increased the war deaths, and is pretty fucking repulsive.

            But now, he's fighting for LGBT rights, uwuu!

            [–]RatherSmallPotato 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            By using the term "biological women" you let them win. Women are women, men are men. There's no such thing as biological women, just women.

            [–]StillLessons 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            This is a very good point. Unfortunately, because the trans-activists have so attacked the language, they make it difficult not to force clarification. Basically, though, I agree with you.