all 3 comments

[–]dapper_dan4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm fine with it. Then all those retard insurrectionists that think they are patriots can finally take what they call home-- or what we sane people like to call fly over country. All of the money, industry, and development is in more liberal areas, and their tax dollars support conservative mouthbreathers that think they are the ones pulling themselves up by the bootstraps. Heck, take all of the South-- the majority of tax remittances are coming from the majority liberal cities. To be clear, the country couldn't actually function this way, but the point here is that you can't have your cake and eat it too, economically speaking anyway.

[–]jamesK_3rd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Absolutely.

You know wheat, grain, corn, beef, beans, and water have been sold at a steep discount and undervalued for far too long.

A move such as this can actually get the realistic and actual price for exporting all these items to democrat havens.

How big are the zoos these days in democrat cities....

[–]dapper_dan4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh, you mean all of those things that the US has been subsidizing for so many years? Sure, but I guess the subsidy would probably go away as well. The US produces massive surpluses of food. We don't have a comparative advantage in large part in food production. But hey, I'm a capitalist, so I tend to see this as a distortion of the free market. See how well those places would do without their federal subsidies (remember the tariffs and soybeans? Yeah, the government had to give them welfare...or "subsidies" if you will, to make sure they stayed afloat).