you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bobbobbybob[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That is the question. It seems to mean different things to different people, so we end up arguing over a word, rather than the authoritarian, socially constricting, voice silencing takeover of our world by globalist technocrats.

Technocracy doesn't have to be ASCVS (fascist) as well.

[–]NodeIndependent 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Agreed, I was never all that clear on the specifices, but now people just use it for things they don't like, even when their own behavior reflects the worst definitions of 'fascism'. See: antifa

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The funniest thing I've seen is when a blog compared Klaus Schwab, Netanyahu and the technocrats to the Reichstag fire and Hitler's alleged master race agenda.

I mean, maybe read Feder and look into the economic and social policies of NS. One can take from it without the eugenics.