use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~1 user here now
It's All Politics
The Bipartisan Push To Gut Section 230 Will Suppress Online Speech
submitted 3 years ago by Drewski from reason.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 3 years ago (3 children)
[removed]
[–]Drewski[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)
The misunderstanding is on your end. That may ostensibly be why he claims to want to remove Section 230, but that would not be the end result. Section 230 prevents social media platforms from being liable for the content posted by their users. Without this protection, many independent sites such as Saidit may not be able to continue. The platform vs. publisher and moderation vs. absolute free speech arguments are red herrings.
[–][deleted] 3 years ago* (1 child)
[–]Drewski[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Section 230 has nothing to do with filtering. Check out this article: You've Been Referred Here Because You're Wrong About Section 230 Of The Communications Decency Act
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] (3 children)
[removed]
[–]Drewski[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–][deleted] (1 child)
[removed]
[–]Drewski[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)