Here's a message from your Grand Dragon.

submitted by Orangutan from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Orangutan[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Time stamp source: https://youtu.be/a3G7n21p0kY?t=4476

[–]Kyto113 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So you cut the first part of the sentence, The part that gives context to the claim and completely reverses the meaning... Wow.

You do know you can't omit The antecedent of a conditional and still preserve the meaning right?

[–]ChillyChili 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Does not reverse the meaning

[–]Kyto113 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The entire quote is predicated on the antecedent of the conditional. It completely changes the meaning of the sentence to omit it.