you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 17 insightful - 7 fun17 insightful - 6 fun18 insightful - 7 fun -  (5 children)

Fuck, this is ISP level censorship. If they get away with this, kiss the internet as you know it goodbye.

[–]bobbobbybob 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

mate, try living in NZ. Our commie leader is PROUD that she's built us a china like internet firewall.

Coming to the world soon. Totalitarian globalists love control.

work arounds are to hack Dns over https into your network stack, use them to access tor services, although that's just saying "hi kikes, monitor me"

Even so, can't post to some sites, cloudflare seems to be working with our government to filter.

Citizen meshes seem like a viable strategy in non-rural areas, but then the 5G rollout puts a rouge AP killing death beam on every streetlamp. Not much you can do if they cook your hardware.

And the Sheeple are being distracted with 'net neutrality' memes, not understanding that's a different issue and any victory there is meaningless if the underlying censorship is not also dealt with. You understand the difference, right?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think so, this is a Section 230 issue.

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What's a Section 230 issue? Good to see you again, dude.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It's nice to see you too. Section 230 is what sets up the publisher vs. platform distinction for US law. Platforms don't have any liability for content created by their users, like a text message (as long as they act in good faith, yada yada).

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks. There is no good faith here, for sure.