What's funny is that anybody can look into her history and draw the same conclusions as "a white supremacist" could. You seem to have problems with people poking at Tulsi.

If I said I supported someone, and someone else said "Hey, check this out! It might change your mind, seeing as there is vital information you may have missed." I would look into the information. Then I would decide whether or not it was worth my while. You seem to just glance at things and say "Doesn't fit my narrative."

For example, I argue with religious people about Yahweh pretty often. They are often giving me information to read/look into, and I really don't care about the information. But since I'm so interested in the topic, I find that I have a better grasp of my own stance (and the stances of others) if I simply give the information the time of day.

Tulsi looks really good, and I would like to imagine her as being one of the real people in politics. I know better, because people who actually rock the boat get pushed out, or they get killed (literally, or financially) So, if Tulsi ever has something like this done to her, then we'll know for certain that she's the real deal. Until then, I'll look at all the information I can about her, and keep my doubts where they are.