Facebook Censors Tucker Carlson for 'False News'

submitted by [deleted] from breitbart.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FreedomUltd 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

No, I don't plan to accept some stupid assignment from you LOL.

You didn't rebut shit. You supported what TC said, you didn't address what Politifact said.

But fuck all that... rebut what Fox's lawyers said LOL!!!

(AND the Trump-appointed judge!)

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You started by insisting you were doing such in-depth digging but that I wouldn't dare look. Yawn. I clicked your silly links and directly quoted and then talked about (ie addressed) some third party's beefs. Feel free to quote them however you want, but don't gaslight me on what I'm doing. My responses are right up there. I totally went out of my way to address what you wanted. Now I give you the same kind of request and it's a "stupid assignment"? Just go back to your MSM koolaid if you can't converse back and forth normally.

[–]FreedomUltd 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

No, you didn't address what they said.

Know what else you didn't address?

Trump appointed judge: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."

LMAO!

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You: "You won't look at this!"

Me: Looks at it. "Here are my comments on some quotes."

You: "You didn't look at this random part! Politifact is the divine holders of Truth!"

Me: "No they aren't. Care to meet this threshold of evidence?"

You: "No! Besides, a lawyer said TC uses comedy! That means it's all lies! LOL!!!"

Me: "I've played your game. Either be serious, or I won't bother."

You: "Here's an unrelated quote without context. LMAO!"

Me: "Normally I'd stop, but your trolling has amused me. Did you really think I wasn't going to dig up whatever crap you're obsessed with? Here's your scooby snack:

Here's the honest context that you dishonestly did not give: https://lmgtfy.app/?q=%22Fox+persuasively+argues%2C+that+given+Mr.+Carlson%27s+reputation%2C+any+reasonable+viewer%22 for the first hit so you can ctrl+f so you can get the justia link for the pdf which concludes that the specific words TC said "are not actionable as defamation". Now, aside from the obvious fact that a legal defense will go with whatever is easiest, rather than whatever is the TRUTH, care to give primary sources for why anyone would give a flying fuck about someone being salty and bringing a (frivolous) court case in order to attack (a political rival)? I mean, other than being like you and just hating the guy you don't like on TV.