you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SaidOverRed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I hope Loomer bends Facebook over. You can screw over the little guy. But when you election meddle by denying 'neutral' platforms to elected congressmen (yes, that's the neuter term), then they deserve their section 230 protections stripped. It was okay to threaten election meddling-enablers with jail in the Trump administration. Sick the DOJ on facebook.

[–]FreedomUltd 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No comment at all on whether Tucker Carlson does, indeed, frequently and regularly post complete bullshit?

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's fair for you to beg the question. The breitbart article did not link the primary source ... but sure, I'll do the legwork for you (and breitbart)

Here is the facebook blurb: https://www.facebook.com/TuckerCarlsonTonight/posts/1303851553283494

Here is a synopsis: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/fox-news-apologizes-for-reporting-debunked-coronavirus-story

tl;dr Tucker echoed a local story which was either untrue, or was but folded under political pressure. I would appreciate someone linking me the raw data so I could determine if the interpretation (that the numbers were fudged) is true or not.

But maybe you have something else in mind that is "complete bullshit"? Maybe you have links and summaries.

[–]FreedomUltd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

LOL! No wonder no one else was willing to step up and foolishly defend Tucker Carlson's reputation. His lawyers just successfully argued the "he's obviously full of shit" defense in court LOL!