you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

maybe the suspension was just for a few days then was done

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The time between when it was posted and the time the OP claimed he was suspended was less than 24 hours, and the poster on Reddit was posting in that time.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

he's got that screen shot there showing it saying he was suspended but it's hard to read, can't tell how many days it says it's for

also maybe they reversed the suspension after he had complained and that thread got big

[–]ExBootlicker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I see in the blurry screenshot that he got suspended for 'three days'

And then we can see from his posting history that he stopped posting for about 4 days after that point.

OP was unclear, but didn't specify which post got the guy suspended. actually he wrote 'posts' (plural) rather than 'post'.

I think its still important to know that Reddit's top level admins call citations with facts 'hate speech'. Whether it is this particular post or another post.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can believe it got him banned, besides just trolling he wrote a long thing full of facts and proof. Reddit admis surely won't like that. It's not against any rules but that never stopped them before. I think they usually allow trolls that make conservatives look bad, just ban the intellectuals that prove their ideology wrong.