you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]VirgilGriff 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

That user wasn't suspended for that. He's posting as of 2 minutes ago: https://www.reddit.com/user/IDislikeYourMeta

[–]ExBootlicker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"Suspended by Reddit Admins for "Hate Speech" after linking study in r/freespeech that says most riots are caused by blm and saying cops don't target black people"

https://www.reddit.com/r/JordanPeterson/comments/ivvc03/suspended_by_reddit_admins_for_hate_speech_after/

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That was posted 5 days before he even made the post that the OP copied and pasted.

[–]ExBootlicker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So you agree that reddit DID suspended the guy due to 'hate speech' for making some highly sourced and in depth posts?

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't agree, because that was never the claim. The claim was that he was suspended for the post in the OP, which is false. If you're going to claim something, make it true.

Are you playing dumb?