you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I am not going to read anything, since I am already an economist of some renown. Over my career, I have forgotten the names associated with each theory, but have acquired an in-depth understanding of how things actually work.

With that in mind, all taxation is only to oppress the people. It serves no other purpose. It is pure evil and an extremely wasteful way to fund a nation.

Yes, currency creation is inflationary, but economic growth is deflationary. By removing the filthy subhuman parasites and their usury, the government printing for their purposes poses no problem whatsoever. Especially when using a hard (think gold-backed) currency.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, currency creation is inflationary, but economic growth is deflationary. By removing the filthy subhuman parasites and their usury, the government printing for their purposes poses no problem whatsoever. Especially when using a hard (think gold-backed) currency.

If you're talking about gold backed fiat, you should try searching up "The Great Depression" if you didn't already know about it.

With that in mind, all taxation is only to oppress the people. It serves no other purpose. It is pure evil and an extremely wasteful way to fund a nation.

Flat tax is usury. Progressive('Progressive' doesn't refer to leftist progressivism) tax is not. Progressive taxes increases as the income of the person increases. For instance, a poor worker would have to pay 4% tax. A worker in the state controlled worker union would have to pay 8% of his income to recieve benefits provided by the goverment(Most workers will be in the goverment controlled union). Lower middle-class would have to pay 12% and upper middle class 16%. In the same way, lower upper class would pay 20% and Bezos level rich would pay 28.5%.

Btw, Schaht was indeed a traitor to the nation, but his economic policy was actually good.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You are not understanding. The great depression was engineered by the international jewish banskters. It has nothing to do with anything, just like any country that removes their central bankster organization is going to have economic warfare waged on it by everything else in the world. Look at Lybia and Gaddafi. They were doing too well, that's the main reason they got "liberated".

And you are trying to educate me about progressive taxation. Sigh. I told you, I am an economist. You are being like a small child using baby talk to explain grow-up stuff to an adult. It's cute, but it's not productive. TAXES SERVE ONLY ONE PURPOSE: TO OPPRESS THE POPULATION. <-- That's a period. PERIOD. FULL STOP.

What the governments of most "developed" nations do with regards to money creation is this:

  1. BORROW a billion from the banksters IN THE NAME OF THE POPULATION;

  2. PRINT (create) the billion in usable currency;

  3. SPEND the billion into the economy;

  4. TAX the people because they're indebted;

  5. PAY BACK the banksters the interest and sometimes also a bit of the capital;

But before banksterism, it was this:

  1. MINT (create) the billion in usable currency;
  2. SPEND the billion into the economy;

Now tell me, what makes the modern system better?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I will reply to your argument in a bit.