you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

did obama even have any charged for corruption

[–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Beyond just the 'but obama,' which be fair is still fairgame, the linked secondary source appears heavily biased. Here's the primary source https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/12/29/2017-27977/exemptions-from-certain-prohibited-transaction-restrictions

Who wants to translate this into laymen's terms and give citations for the interpretation? Bonus points for explaining like I'm five exactly what the links in the chain are that makes said actions corruption.