you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]StillLessons 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Defending "Cuties" is a great litmus test for a person's innate morality. How many among us want 11-year-olds to be treated as fully available sexual playthings? That's the basic question. Once 11 (which is already pre-pubescent) is normal, the next move will be to 8, then 5, then infants. Why not? Sexual abuse of these age groups is already happening; the abusers just aren't confident enough yet to try to pretend it's normal. They'll start with 11. This is what they think they can get away with.

This is evil.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Do you know anyone IRL who has defended it? It seems that all the defense comes from the MSM.

[–]scrubking[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Go to youtube. There are quite a number defending it or at least saying it's no big deal.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, the tiny minority who project their voices through media.

Also, don't confuse those who say "it's no big deal" with those who defend it. Some people just don't give a fuck because they don't have kids and there is so much more going on in the world. There is only so much shit you can deal with at one time.