Salon owner slammed by Pelosi officially closes down her business, is 'afraid' to return to San Francisco

submitted by Trulytimes from (trulytimes.com)

all 15 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]HiddenFox 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I wonder if the business is worth $336k?

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    he could just take the $3 hundo k, if she is smart she can retire on that, already kinda old.

    [–]hennaojichan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    That money will help relieve the pain of moving out of a shithole city like SF.

    [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

    WHO CARES

    [–]horatioherbert 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    The woman who lost her livelihood and the people she is responsible for, possibly

    [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Might be a PsyOp

    [–]horatioherbert 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    At this point anything is possible

    [–]Nanner 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Most likely.

    Everything seems manufactured these days. Its exhausting.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    I think you mean "WhAt DiFfErEnCe DoEs It MaKe?"

    Or are you actually being serious?

    [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Distractions.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    I actually think this one isn't a distraction. It quite clearly shows, on video, an elected official responsible for shutting down businesses, flaunting the very thing she is telling others to do.

    [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Yes, but it still maybe a PsyOp. Meaning, that she intended to do this as a perception management tactic

    [–]Nanner 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Its also intended to encourage people to report those not complying.

    [–]shariajustice 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    the police department in san francisco is corrupted with gangs that are employed as police officers. the prisons in california are corrupted with gangs that work on staff. every aspect of san francisco is corrupted.

    if you cross wires with these gangs, if they dont kill you they will scare the shit outta you and you will leave town.

    i know.

    the gangs have controlled things at the government level for more than a while now.

    this is why things are so purely fkd up.

    i guarantee you that pelosi is walking hand in hand with criminals.

    [–]Nanner 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Whatever. Played her role. Got her paycheck.

    Notice how with the shooting hoaxes, they usually get a lot of donations after? Must be an incentive to really "sell it" to the public.

    Pelosi is an idiot, but we don't need some manufactured soap opera to further manipulate emotions and teach us that if we don't comply, we will be reported and any reporter will be praised.

    There are plenty of other things to already attack Pelosi on.