Why Aren’t Insurers 9/11 Truthers? As we approach the 19th anniversary of the 9/11 false flag, insurers paid Silverstein and his cohorts over 4 and a half billion dollars as a result of the attacks. Why did they pay out billions of dollars without calling the official 9/11 narrative into question?

submitted by Orangutan from corbettreport.com

all 5 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]ANIKAHirsch 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You just think they're insurance companies, and not money-laundering operations for these billionaires.

[–]screwballeclipsed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

it was a pretty good heist since (((silversteen))) got paid twice. i'm surprised (((he))) didn't try to get paid for the third (wtc7) building that was demolished.

[–]flush_the_turd 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-corbett-report/

[–]fred_red_beans 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's just the opinion of Dave Van Zandt and is ad hominem.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They are also tribesmen. And probably got kickbacks.