you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Not to Christ. All brothers, whatever nation, are brothers in Christ. It need not matter your geene-pool. Though, as Christians we marry Christians, so in a way, Christianity is about preaching "The Way" and converting others, not by sword but by the grace of the holy spirit. Christianity, as it was suppose to be, would have entailed a gene-pool over the generations if Christians had not fallen away.

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Have you read 'The Coming Battle' by Walbert? Does he promote the mythological Lincoln?

      So, the right thing to do would be to emigrate all african-Americans back to where they came from, despite the passage of time, by force? The money-power used cattle slavery and would do it again in the US, if it wasn't made illegal and replaced with permanent public debt.

      I quite agree with everything you've written about. I'm certainly not as learned on the subject of banking and as a layperson have tried to understand this system as best as I could. I do not see what is wrong with Indepedent treasuries and silver certificates.

      But as you know, like Napoleon, preventing the money power from taking over your country means war. If you let them, you get the facade of peace with cyclical boom and bust doldrums.

      I understand it, that you focus on the greenbackers that manufacture quotes and push the mythological Lincoln but I'm asking. What do we do?

      You say you are a fascist. So what do you suppose be implemented? A constitutional fascist government?

      How could we depreciate Federal reserve notes and institute silver certificates without causing a massive economic collapse?

      I'm certain the current president would do no such thing.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Yes, that Walbert. Only thing I ever found that Walbert wrote about Lincoln:

        “ No men living are more worthy to be trusted than those who toil up from poverty ; none else inclined to take or touch aught which they have not honestly earned . Let them beware of surrendering a political power which they already possess and which, if surrendered, will surely be used to close the doors of advancement against such as they, and to fix new disabilities and burdens upon them till all of liberty shall be lost .” — Abraham Lincoln

        Lincoln was a puppet of the money-power, whether he knew it or not, Walbert, never once talks about Lincoln, he doesn't push the mythological Lincoln like certain modern authors do today, rather, he ignores Lincoln altogether.

        But had Lincoln not been killed, he hinted that he would have emigrated blacks back to their home countries. From the point of his assassination, the radical republican reconstructionists took over.