all 7 comments

[–]Rah 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

And thats good, for the wrong reasons.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Or is it wrong for a good rǝ̵̺̓ason?

[–]Rah 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is good to be highly skeptical of a product that you cant sue its manufacturers by law. Especially when such product is inoculated on you. If you do it for the wrong reasons ("orange man bad") then that is good, but not in the way you think it is good.

[–]flugegeheimen 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Traditional anti-vaxxing and refusal of COVID vaccine are two different things. Not because "trump is ebil" but because this vaccine is extremely rushed and also serves as a tool to make political points. If you have at least two brain cells you will wait and watch what happens with those who take it.

[–]Drewski 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Those who lived through the 1976 swine flu are rightfully skeptical of flu vaccines.

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's funny because in Europe the anti-vax movement has always been left wing.

It's silly to assume such ways of thinking belong to one political party.

[–]soyboy77 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And in so doing leave themselves vulnerable... What's the problem if some dumbfucks don't want to take a vaccine? Gene pools need to be fortified somehow...