you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]horatioherbert 19 insightful - 3 fun19 insightful - 2 fun20 insightful - 3 fun -  (12 children)

The mob is free to pillage, loot and burn but you cannot defend yourself and your property using your God-given rights, the lunatics are running the asylum

[–]igorness 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

He's from another state. He wasn't protecting "his" property. He's also 17.

[–]Iam1ofMany 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Kenosha is 20 miles from his home town. While it is factually correct to say he is from another state it is a bunch of bullshit to act like he didn't live right there.

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

While it is factually correct to say he is from another state

Not only factually, LEGALLY. Not only is it illegal local and state but FEDERALLY.

[–]Iam1ofMany 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Illegal for what exactly?

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Crossing state lines with a gun to commit a crime. Not the gun specifically but he deliberately put himself in harm's way. His use of the gun would only apply on his OWN property. He would not have been in any danger if he stayed home. He now faces local, state AND federal crimes for it.

[–]Iam1ofMany 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Is there any proof he crossed state lines with the gun? Keep in mind the burden of proof is on the one bringing the charges.

I would also like a link to the actual charge that you would be charging him with exactly. I like to see wording of said law.

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

https://v.redd.it/vsrmdvtogzj51

Count 1: FIRST DEGREE RECKLESS HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

Count 2: FIRST DEGREE RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING SAFETY, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

Count 3: FIRST DEGREE INTENTIONAL HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

Count 4: ATTEMPT FIRST DEGREE INTENTIONAL HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

Count 5: FIRST DEGREE RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING SAFETY, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

Count 6: POSSESSION OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON BY A PERSON UNDER 18

[–]Iam1ofMany 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What does this have to do with him crossing state lines which is what our discussion was? I don't see any charges related to that right?

[–]Iam1ofMany 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"Kyle did not carry a gun across state line," L. Lin Wood said in a tweet Friday morning. "The gun belonged to his friend, a Wisconsin resident. The gun never left the state of Wisconsin."

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/crime/2020/08/26/wisconsin-open-carry-law-kyle-rittenhouse-legally-have-gun-kenosha-protest-shooting-17-year-old/3444231001/

[–]igorness 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

https://v.redd.it/vsrmdvtogzj51

Count 1: FIRST DEGREE RECKLESS HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

Count 2: FIRST DEGREE RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING SAFETY, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

Count 3: FIRST DEGREE INTENTIONAL HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

Count 4: ATTEMPT FIRST DEGREE INTENTIONAL HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

Count 5: FIRST DEGREE RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING SAFETY, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON

Count 6: POSSESSION OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON BY A PERSON UNDER 18

[–]Iam1ofMany 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

What does this have to do with him crossing state lines which is what our discussion was? I don't see any charges related to that right?

[–]bald-janitor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

He is a troll