you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Chipit[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Do you have anything to add regarding the accurate description of life under far left rule?

    “Comrades, everyone knows that our social system is the most humane in the world. But our humanism is of the militant and activist kind. It is not expressed in mawkish sentiment and universal forgiveness, but in a ruthless war on all manifestations of hostile ideas. Right now, for instance, we have standing before us a pathetic man who is mumbling something, and it would be a natural human impulse to take pity on him, to feel compassion. But think about it: he felt no compassion for us.

    It's cancel culture in action, but with the backing of a fully armed government facing a disarmed population.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Tigerbitecrazy 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      Lmao Chipshit did the same thing when I shut his attempt to argue about a month ago. He doesn't believe in debate, he believes in ruffling feathers until someone bites and then does the whole "oh you can read minds" until they get frustrated enough to stop the discussion and claims he "won"

      My point for his other post was similar. He lies (cops poisoned by shake shack employees) with a sensationalized headline, hopes to drag people into mud so he can shout "BUT MUH PYRAMID OF DEBATE" as he dodges your legitimate questions (response article ON THE SAME WEBSITE saying the officers admitted that the shakes tasted weird so they threw them away but the burgers and fries were fine) and then he adds more bullshit to the discussion to distract you from the fact that he did exactly what the MSM does every day. Lie to get you leaning in a specific directions.

      Don't be surprised if he tosses the "liberals are idiots" study at you too. I'm not a liberal by ANY means but apparently that was his way of attacking my character instead of addressing my retorts....

      All of his arguments are built on divisiveness but good forbid you point it out or it turns into him throwing a tantrum.