Socialism: Why World’s Worst Idea Won’t Die

submitted by sproketboy from nationalreview.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If I'm wrong explain how I'm wrong. These childish insults aren't cleaver, and they sure as hell aren't an argument. There is nothing more pathetic than making yourself feel right with petty ad hominem attacks.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You are correct. My childish insults aren't "cleaver". Also, I can do better than petty ad hominems. For that I apologise.

Your oversimplified blanket statements paint EVERYONE with the same brush. That is not only simple-minded but it lacks any nuance or critical thinking. It's the egalitarian thinking most rational people despise when individual fairness is required. Everyone's situation is different. Parents, family, generations, society, economics, employment, school, culture, opportunities, and fucking everything in the Universe is ever changing and different. Everyone inherits different evolving circumstances and has to make the best of what they have. Not everyone is lucky the first, second, or even third chance they get - but continue to try they must. Not only is it not just the parents (who you brought up) it's the entire world that is both to blame and to credit for all the good and bad things that happen to you. Maybe your parents were status quo supporters, or ineffective activists, or game-changers - was it enough or too much?

Yes, it's all far too nebulous the way I've outlined it. Everything and nothing is true, etc etc etc. It's better to be too open than too closed IMO, and you simplify and shut it down, mistaken all the way...

" My source is the fact that communist countries fall into poverty after cannibalizing the fruits of the capitalist societies they destroyed. "

Nonsense. Capitalism has wins because they're the most invasive with an abundance of infiltration and corruption techniques.

" They don't produce nobel prize winners. "

All awards shows are political and rigged. It doesn't take much effort to find evidence of this.

" They don't produce innovation. "

You mean the space race was imaginary and that the West wasn't actually dependent on Russian spacecraft to get to the ISS?

" They don't advance science. "

See above. Also, where are all the iPhones manufactured? You can't advance if you don't have manufacturing to build upon. Also, while the biolabs were shut down in the US, the funding was sent to China to set up their bioweapons labs in Wuhan among other places. Sure Coronavirus may have come from China, but it was funded by the US. Both were advancing their evil science and now both are pushing their corrupt scientism. Part of the deal.

" The don't enrich their countries or people. "

So all the skyscrapers and millionaires in Russia and China are fiction? Such and absurd blanket statement that it's profoundly idiotic.

" They can't even maintain the same standard of living as has been developed before free education, let alone improve it in any way. "

Again. Stupid, baseless without proof, and oh... very stupid.

You're a waste of time and energy because you likely won't even read this. Further you'll keep on spouting the same shit because you're not honestly here to learn, you're here to debate. I won't indulge you further. Either you're a shill or an idiot, or both.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your oversimplified blanket statements paint EVERYONE with the same brush.

So do yours. It is impossible to have any kind of conversation without any kind of generalization. Mine are more accurate than yours because they are true for a larger percentage of people.

That is not only simple-minded but it lacks any nuance or critical thinking.

This is wrong. You are trying to make arguments with exceptions. I acknowledge that the exceptions exist; I also recognize that they are exceptions. You don't seem to understand what that means. You seem to think that the only way to be nuanced is to act as though the exceptions are the rule.

Everyone's situation is different.

And yet you make generalized claims about how they are victims and not responsible for the costs they incurred. The reality is, and you implicitly accept it, that generalizations can be made; and in fact need to be made to have any conversation at all. Then you want to turn around and claim that my generalization, and somehow only my generalization, must be wrong because of infinite variability of people. THIS IS NOT LOGICAL OR REASONABLE.

Maybe your parents were status quo supporters,

My parents were a hindrance not a benefit to my path in life. The leftist claim that we are the products of circumstances beyond our control is bullshit. It is 20% luck and 80% the actions and choices you make. You can claim I am wrong on that all you want, but you are the one running face first into incorrect assumptions about me because your world view is so flawed.

It is the losers of the world who always believe that their failures are not their fault. It is the winners of the world who believe the opposite. It is the winners of the world who are far more likely to be right because clearly they understand the world well enough to be the winners. It is nothing but a copping mechanism to make bullshit claims about how the winners didn't earn their victories despite not knowing a single thing about them besides the fact that they are winners.

[capitalism has] an abundance of infiltration and corruption techniques.

horse shit. There is a reason all the leftists chant "real communism hasn't been tried". The reason is they don't recognize corrupt communist regimes as "real communism". So why is it that all the socialist and communist experiments are so instantly corrupted into poverty if it is capitalism (which lasts hundreds of years with prosperity) that has all the corruption?

You can't steal wealth from the poor. Capitalism CREATES WEALTH. Even if it is by forcing people to work harder than they normally would, and even if (not saying it is true) the workers are stripped of their products; it is capitalism that got them to make those things VOLUNTARILY. Communism needs to force people to work like slaves at the end of a gun barrel because when everything you get is given to you and everything you create is taken from you NO ONE WANTS TO WORK. It is retarded to think anyone would do any work what so ever when they have everything given to them, and working does nothing but take away their time. And when no one works WEALTH IS NOT CREATED.

All awards shows are political and rigged

Oh how convenient. But true or not they don't produce the things that those awards purport to recognize. The Nobel prize comes after the discovery or innovation, and it is that discovery and innovation that does not get produced under communism.

You mean the space race was imaginary

It is widely known that most of the technology of the soviet union was stolen through espionage. Including nuclear tech and rocket tech, which was based on stolen tech from Nazi Germany. But there you go again trying to use an exception to argue against the rule. As a rule the US is far more innovative than Russia. Soviet or otherwise.

Also, where are all the iPhones manufactured? You can't advance if you don't have manufacturing to build upon.

You are contradicting yourself. The Phones are produced NOT INVENTED in china under the direction of American inventors. Yet it is China and not America that has all the factories and yet America is inventing and not China.

So all the skyscrapers and millionaires in Russia and China are fiction?

The millionaires in Russia get their wealth from natural resources, not technology. And again you are using exceptions to argue against the rule. The rule is that people in Russia and China are far poorer than in capitalist countries.

Again. Stupid, baseless without proof, and oh... very stupid.

The proof is every country that went from capitalism to socialism or communism. The common man's standard of living goes up for a short time until the money that was "socialized" by the government is spent. Then the quality of live plummets to all new lows. Every. Single. Time. What is stupid is how you can willfully overlook all the evidence and make such a statement that is literally the opposite of the truth.

You're a waste of time and energy because you likely won't even read this.

I read it all, despite how stupid and wrong it all is. And I even made the effort to correct it.

because you're not honestly here to learn, you're here to debate

What have you learned?