Florida/Texas small fraction of new York deaths.

submitted by jamesK_3rd from outkick.com

all 3 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]jamesK_3rd[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

http://archive.is/DCo8c

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Deaths lag infections by 2-3 weeks, and New York had mass deaths because almost half their population lives in one crowded, wealthy (i.e. older) city with a lot more international traffic which brought the virus to them much sooner. Of course a viral infection will spread more rapidly there, and sooner, and of course that will result in more deaths.

[–]jamesK_3rd[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can believe men can be women. You can believe Florida and Texas are going to be worse than New York.

The data doesn't give a fuck about your ideology or your inept IQ. You'll obviously believe whatever.

The virus is a really bad flu strain for individuals under 45.

New York is bad because the people of the empire state chose to save themselves by executing anyone living in a nursing home or assisted living facility. That's the truth Bottom line.