Proof that Radical Feminists cannot engage in a proper serious debate - when confronted, /u/radfem provides evidence that does not agree with her own arguments, dodges direct questions, and resorts to personal attacks when out of all other options.

submitted by teelo from saidit.net

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Quixoticfutz 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

LOL this is sad dude, and after seeing the linked comments it shows you're scrambling. How you thought linking to that would help you is beyond comprehension

[–]teelo[S] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

So all you have is a personal attack? Just proving my point: All Radical Feminists can do is use personal attacks. You've got nothing.

[–]Quixoticfutz 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Ahahahh you dont even seem to know what a personal attack is, feeling sensitive for some reason it seems, probaby the ass whooping you got on those comments that you tried to use as proof. Funniest thing I've seen today.

[–]teelo[S] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

Oh look, more personal attacks. You still have nothing to back up your agenda, just attacks against others!

[–]Quixoticfutz 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

This is really sad now dude...

[–]teelo[S] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

You've got nothing.

[–]Quixoticfutz 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Looool come now, you see attacks everywhere (or don't know what a personal attack is perhaps?) but somehow fail to see when someone kicked your ass in an argument

[–]teelo[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Still waiting for you to make a point that directly proves me wrong.

[–]Quixoticfutz 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You proved yourself wrong both in the comments you linked and here ahahaha don't need to do much really

[–]teelo[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Show me how?