Liberals Worried That Without Cancel Culture They'd Actually Have To Defend Their Ideas

submitted by scrubking from babylonbee.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MuricaPersonified 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

The problem with Ashkenazis with similar ancestry to you is they will shapeshift back and forth from white and jew, depending on what's most convenient for them at the time. The reason I think anyone with a shred of jewish blood should be separated is chiefly because of their inherently nepotistic social structure and that they will employ subterfuge and sow discord to keep their cover.

[–]liberty_primer 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

A.) Ashkenazi Jews are basically the same as southern Italians and Greeks on a genetic level. Shall we ban southern meds while we’re at it?

B.) Well over half of American Jews intermarry. 77% for Jews that aren’t religious. If they were that inclined toward nepotism and in group preference, that wouldnt happen. It may have been the case in the past, but it is not now.

C.) By all means separate yourself out, but don’t act like you have any legitimate claim on how I live my life. I didn’t do anything to you.

D.) I’m not shapeshifting into anything. I don’t bullshit anyone into thinking I’m anything I’m not.

[–]MuricaPersonified 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Italians aren't honkeys, and I have Greek family that is insufferable, so sure.

They're don't have to be religious to support the zionist agendas; they're actually some of the worst SJWs.

Depends on what you support. If you advocate for policies that affect my rights, then that is a hypocritical statement. Live and let live was a failed experiment.

Ok, glad to hear that you don't play that card.

[–]liberty_primer 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I literally support your right to start an ethnostate as long as you minimize the number of people you displace.

Yes. It’s okay to exclude me.

So no, I’m not a threat to your rights.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What if we want our ethnostate, the USA, to be an ethnostate as the founders intended it to be.

Why would we give up our ethnostate, the USA?

[–]liberty_primer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Nah. That would displace me a lot of other people. I’d oppose that and fight you on it.

If you’re gonna go with “birthright” arguments then you don’t have an ethical leg to stand on in the USA. The USA isn’t some ethnic homeland. It was stolen through conquest.

I also care about individual freedom of choice. I don’t care about mega corporate or ethic empires existing. Hell, big empires shouldn’t be a thing at all. Empire was a mistake.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Right. This means you're taking part in the genocide of whites. The US was founded by whites and for whites. This only changed in 1965 with the promise that it would not change the mark up of the demographics.
If you're non-white, then you're in the US and residing in the US as a conqueror and colonizer and actively fighting whites who does not want to be colonized. In this sense, you're no different than those who slaughtered the indians. We might be descendants of colonizers but you are part of the colonizing and the ongoing genocide.

If you're fighting us if we resist the colonization of our lands, then you are a conqueror. However you feel justified in this is up to you, but I feel justified in defending myself and my own.

[–]liberty_primer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Fair enough. That makes us enemies then. Just know, I’d be more than happy to live and let live.

You’re creating the issue, not me.

PS: Genocide involves actually actively killing people. If the colonists left the Amerindians alone or attempted to coexist with them, it wouldn’t have been genocide.

[–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, you're the one colonizing. You are making the issue. I'd be more than happy to live and let live but you're colonizing our lands and refusing to leave when asked. You have a homeland. This is ours.

Genocide can happen without actively killing people. If you put 1 million africans on Iceland with a population of 100k, then you'd see the icelandish people gone within a few generations or reduced to nothing. This is what you're doing. One street, one city, one state at a time. A slow and steady displacement and genocide of whites in our own lands.

You can live and let live in our seperate lands. However you and your kind want ours, while proclaiming "we come in peace".